They enjoyed innocence until they were proven guilty.
And now their guilt is proven,
beyond any reasonable doubt.
Pleading the fifth, stonewalling, "no comment", ...
however "not telling the truth" is framed,
is proof of guilt.
Because there are only ethical justifications for"not tell the truth"
and none of them apply.
They are guilty.
Maybe not in a court of law,
where the lawyers of APS/Modrall hold sway,
where legal loopholes and technicalities allow their practice
of Juris Mustelidae (legal weaselry) against the public interest.
But certainly they are guilty in the hearts and minds
of the voters, tax payers, and stakeholders who's interests
they have betrayed.
There is only one reason not to tell the truth
about the conspiracy to cover up Peanut Butter Gate.
And there is only one reason not to tell the truth
about the conspiracy to cover up all of the other "gates"
in the relentless shit storm of "APS Gates".
There is only one reason not to conduct an immediate,
full scale forensic administrative accountability audit of
the administration of the APS, by the leadership of the APS.
And, that reason is proof of their guilt
beyond any reasonable doubt.
Now, how do we hold them accountable?
if Thomas Lang, Kent Walz, Phill Casaus,
Michelle Donaldson, Sue Stephens, and
Thomas Pearl
are each and every one of them,
willing to help Darren White, and Kari Brandenburg
and Linda Sink, hide their guilt.
Friday, February 08, 2008
Darren White, Kari Brandenburg, and Linda Sink Are Guilty
Posted by ched macquigg at 11:04 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Ched, glad to know that you are judge, jury and executioner. What happened to the rule of law? Has it been taken over by the law of Ched.
Figure it out Ched, you make wild claims about people in public office and then you wonder why no one listens to you.
Duh!
Frank Garcia
Mr. Garcia,
Apparently you have not understood the essay.
It seems that you expect me to defend a position that I have not taken.
Darren White will not answer legitimate questions about his conduct or competence as a public servant.
You sir, need to do some figuring out of your own. What good and ethical reason supports his failure to be honest with stakeholders?
Wild claim? it stands on its face.
no one listening? I guess we'll see.
The sum of your comments that I have read on blogs, suggests that you are a critic, and not a creator.
Never the less I appreciate your interest and look forward to a discussion of the actual facts related to any allegation that I have ever made;
most of which are substantiated by polygraph,
and none of which has ever been refuted by evidence or sworn testimony.
Out of loyalty to Darren White, you have joined with the wrong side in the fight.
By wrong, I mean the side which does not want to be held accountable for their conduct and competence as public servants.
Hey, good idea Ched - let's havea public polygraph. We can take questions from the media, with not rehearsal, like that show on tv that tests your ethics, it will be fun!
Post a Comment