Sunday, November 23, 2014

Esquivel's re-election campaign gets boost from KRQE

According to APS' award-
winning website, this is what
School Board Member
Marty Esquivel looks like.
Based on the assumption
the incumbent is in the race until
you hear otherwise;  APS School
Board Member Marty Esquivel
would like to be re-elected;
he's in til he's out.

If he is running, his re-election
effort is having a great week on
KRQE TV.

Not only are they still not investigating and not reporting on Esquivel and the board's;
  • new policy and procedures for limiting public participation in public meetings; a naked effort to escape individual criticism and accountability for their public service and to bolster a non-viable defense he and the board are putting up in federal court.  Or upon his and the board's,
  • squandering of the people's trust and treasure as they in meet in secret, without a creating any record of any kind, spending without any real oversight and without limit, in defense of Marty Esquivel's ego and their own self-interests. Or upon his and board's
  • utter abandonment of their obligations as the senior-most role models of student standards of conduct
but now, they have instead,
  • made him the star of an oft running ad promoting  a Larry Barker exclusive.  
He couldn't ask for better pre-election exposure if he was paying for it.

Disclosure;
in the following paragraphs this morning, I inadvertently posted another station's call letters; I meant to have typed KRQE and the change is now reflected in the follow below. 
It is worth noting, except for Esquivel not being their lawyer too (as far as we know),  KRQE, KOAT, and KOB TV are all same same, as I wrote  this morning;
Not one of them wants to looking at ethically redacted findings of investigations of felony criminal misconduct involving APS senior administrators
In his other life, Esquivel is KRQE's lawyer.
His advice;
don't press KRQE's IPRA request for ethically redacted public records of findings in investigations of allegations of felony criminal criminal misconduct in the leadership of APS' publicly funded private police force.

The Journal, let's say
Editor in Chief Kent Walz,
does they same for Esquivel;
running his photo and quotes
about as many times as they can, without being too obvious.

The same holds true for KOAT and KOB TV and now DCF, though the path of the influence of the APS over Sophie Martin's DCF is unclear.
 

The common thread in the establishment's media is former APS School Board heavy hitter Paula Maes.

Maes, the CEO and President of the NM Broadcasters Assoc holds sway enough with them it seems, to enjoy their complicity and or complacency in the cover up of an ethics, standards and accountability scandal in the leadership of the of the largest school districts in the country.



All of this is so very wrong on so many levels.

And yet, plausibly deniable and "legally" defensible.

You can fight back by making
APS' individual and institutional
Ethics, Standards and Accountability 
the issue in the school board election.
Weed out any candidate who is not willing to
role model honest accountability to meaningful
standards of conduct and competence in their public service.
If we want students to grow into adults who embrace character and courage and honor, someone has to be willing to show them what they look like.



photos Mark Bralley

Saturday, November 22, 2014

Character education in particular, isn't for everybody (all at once).

Never mind that no education is for everybody all at once because there is no such thing as a one size fits all education in any subject.

Character education in particular, and more than any other, is based on individual witnessing someone else's personal example.
Character is taught by personal example.
It can be taught only by personal example.

You don't teach character; you can show students it looks like.  You set an example.  Even if your example is of falling short and accepting the consequences.

All achievement gaps are individual, their mitigation has to be individualized at least to some practical limit.


It may sound oxymoronic, but
it is possible to make a collective
effort to pay individual attention.

This whether it is their math skills,
their reading skills, or their
character development in need of our individual attention.

Charles "ched" Mac Quigg
running for the APS School  Board, District 4 on my own terms;
  • Honest actual accountability to meaningful standards of conduct and competence for politicians and public servants within their public service to the APS, to nearly 90,000 of this community's sons and daughters, and to the community members they serve.
  • Meaningful participation by stake and interest holders in decision making that affects their interests.  Open and honest and civil two-way public discussions of important issues.
  • Transparency limited only by the law; ethical redaction of the public records of the spending of their considerable resources, and the wielding of their considerable power.
The very things the
incumbent Marty  Esquivel
is litigating to prevent;
using limitless operational 
dollars, and under no real oversight.

Self-over sight and  
subordinate oversight
are not oversight,
they are oxymora.




photo Mark Bralley

Friday, November 21, 2014

Esquivel's truancy problem solution illustrates APS' problem solving problem

In the Journal this morning, link, a report on a discussion that took place during the school board meeting Wednesday evening.  The discussion was not specifically listed on the agenda.

I only bring this up because the policy and procedural directive that School Board Member Marty Esquivel  designed prohibits open discussion amongst board members or any item not listed on the Board Meeting agenda.

In the statement they read at the beginning of public forum, they inform us that they can't respond to speakers when they are standing right in front of them during public forum, but, if you want to, you can hang around until the very end of the meeting, at which time  there is a time, the "only" time, when board members are "legally" allowed to respond to statements or questions raised during public forum.

Think about it, they can't respond to a question during public forum because the OMA won't permit them. but, the OMA does permit them to can respond later, to the same question, if they feel like it. 

Operational dollars paid to codify a dodge Esquivel and his lawyers designed, to enable them to escape the expectation of having to respond to inconvenient questions about;
  • ethics, standards and accountability in APS
  • the cover up of a cover up of felony criminal misconduct involving senior APS administrators, or about,
  • their abandonment of their responsibilities as the senior-most role models of APS student standards of conduct.
According to Journal Reporter Jon Swedien;
Marty Esquivel wants his colleagues on the Albuquerque Public Schools board to consider throwing their support behind a proposal that would allow schools to strip habitually truant students of their driver’s licenses.
The board took no action.  Basically, Esquivel had an idea and it didn't fly for a number of good reasons; not the least of which; the unintended and yet to be considered consequences.

It is however, a good illustration of the APS two-step decision making process;
1.  a problem is identified (and immediately hidden as necessary until addressed) and then

2.  some school board member or senior administrator comes up with a "bright idea" and orders its implementation.
What we have is a relentless belief that the really good ideas flow down from on high, because school board members and superintendents know more than all of rest of us.

What is missing from the process, is the part where a school board member or superintendent reasons that there is a problem and that there are other places to look for solutions beside the "leadership" circle; a bunch of good ol' boys who haven't been in a classroom for decades if ever at all.

The pool of resources for decision making is vast.
APS teachers alone, for example, have between them
around 100,000 years of teaching experience, and
no seat at the table where decisions are made.

Upon election to the Board,
I will a fight for meaningful
participation by stakeholders
in decision making that
affects their interests.

All interest and stakeholders.

Marty Esquivel won't.
Never has, never will.




photo Mark Bralley

Thursday, November 20, 2014

No matter what the final APS calendar looks like, one thing never changes.

APS has published the school calendar for school year 2015-2016, link.  Ever notice that first semester finals are always the week before the winter break and not the week after?

Charles "ched" MacQuigg
APS School Board Dist 4
For whatever other reason first semester always ends before the winter break, finals are taken before the break because if the same tests were given to the same students when they came back two or three weeks later, their test scores would be lower, significantly lower.

It speaks to the transience of most "learning" and by logical extension the ridiculousness of trying to make children learn and be tested in unison over the very same material on the very same day for twelve years.
Individual lifelong learners created at the earliest opportunity.
Which would you rather;
  • try to form thinking and learning "choirs" of  30 or more individual students who by their very nature resist standardization,
or
  • enable students to learn out of control, under close supervision?
Worthy of civil discourse imho.




photo Mark Bralley

One minute is the new "two minutes" at APS public forum

Once, long ago, speakers at school board public forums were allowed to speak for three minutes.  Now it is two.  Except that now it's one - at any meeting where more than15 people show up to speak.  Of late, a lot of people are standing up at public forum.

After years of neglect, public forums are building steam;
the simplest manifestation of government of the people
and by the people.

The last time School Board Member Marty Esquivel ran for the school board, he, I and others were participating in a school board candidate forum.  He was addressing some issue and prefaced his response by pointing out that the two minutes he had to speak, were not enough to build a cogent argument on any substantial issue.

I nearly laughed out loud.

Because as a school board member he has never given the community members he serves more than two minutes to speak.   And that, only once every two weeks, or less.

Esquivel is the architect of the Board's new governing rules over public forum.  The rules declare; if more than 15 people stand up to speak, their two minutes just became one.

The "speech" that speakers might have spent hours shortening, is now two times too long.  What are they to do; read the first half, the last, the middle, every other word?  Frustration lead one speaker to leave the meeting rather than play the game on a lopsided field.

The board, according to Esquivel's rules, will accept a written presentation from those who cannot say what they need to say in 60 seconds.  But first, the written presentation will be reviewed and abbreviated as necessary by school board staff

Once, NM State Representative Janice Arnold-Jones stood up at the public forum in a school board meeting and delivered a petition carrying more than 100 signatures of community members in support of the board's recognition of a Citizens Advisory Council on Communication.





When asked some time later in a different context, why the board had seemingly ignored that petition, School Board Member David Robbins said he/they had never read nor even seen it.


There is a new camera covering school board meetings from the back of the room.  They won't say why they need that perspective, but, if you viewed the record from that camera during public forum, you would see school board members "not looking at speakers".

Whether they're tapping, texting, tweeting or twerking
is hidden from cameras and public view behind a
couple of hundred thousand dollars worth of Kevlar and hardwood.

I have participated in public forums in public meetings of the APS School Board more or less regularly since 2006.

I began attending regularly at the time when the board had voted unanimously remove the role modeling clause from their own ethics and standards.  The role modeling clause once read;
In no case shall the standards of conduct for an adult, be lower than the standards of conduct for students.
I found their abdication outrageous; cowardly and corrupt.

I found it so, in the context of a set of beliefs I held and hold still.
I arrived at those of beliefs at the behest of my employer; the Albuquerque Public Schools Board of Education.
Thirty teachers had been selected, I among them, to attend training in Character Counts!; a nationally recognized, accepted and respected code of ethical conduct.

APS paid my salary, my sub's salary, and for Character Counts! Founding Father Michael Josephson to come to Albuquerque to enable us to embrace a set of beliefs.  We were to take it so seriously that we were to go out into schools and communities and "preach" those beliefs - on behalf of the board!
The Pillars of Character Counts!, link, are APS student standards of conduct.  Whether they should or should not be is moot; they are. Every year since 1994, when the board unanimously adopted them, the board has reiterated it's expectation that students "model and promote the Pillars of Character Counts!"

It was, and still is outrageous that they would simply (try to) abandon their obligations as the senior-most role models of accountability to the same standards of conduct they establish and enforce upon students.
Rather than listen to me ask them;
Is there even one of of you who will explain to students, in words they can understand;
why students are expected to hold themselves actually and honestly accountable to higher standards of conduct than the law, 
and
school board members are not.
They have gone to some pretty extraordinary; illegal and unethical lengths to keep me from asking the question and them from being on the record stonewalling instead of responding on the public record.

They have edited the tapes they broadcast to stake and interest holders, deleting my questions and more importantly, their unwillingness to response.  At one time, they once moved the public forum outside the meeting to keep if off the record.

There is not one of them willing, to this day, to explain why there are two standards of conduct in the APS;
  • one set of higher standards for students and 
  • other much lower standards for school board members, superintendents, and anyone else they decide to shelter under the umbrella of legal weaselry, unlimited budgets and self and subordinate oversight.



photos Mark Bralley

Wednesday, November 19, 2014

The fight over Character Education in the APS

It would help if we agreed at the onset, to not get bogged down in endless debate on the definitions of terms like "character education" and "ethical".  The endless debate serves the interests of those who would rather debate than be held actually and honestly accountable to higher standards of conduct than the law, however they are defined.

There is some evidence that at least some people think it is important to teach children to embrace honest accountability to "ethical" standards of conduct. 

For example, we think honest accountability to meaningful standards of conduct is important enough that we are willing to repeat a centuries old fable, link, which had been repeated to us when we were children, about a child, a hatchet and a cherry tree.

The leadership of the APS thought character education was important enough to resolve unanimously to adopt ethical standards of conduct, link, for students, and the continue annually, to require them to model and promote (honest accountability) to those standards.

The leadership of the APS thought character education was important enough, at the time, they had written in their own standards of conduct, a standard which read;

In no case shall the standards of conduct for an adult
be lower than the standards of conduct for students.
They have since removed the role modeling clause from their own standards of conduct; by unanimous decision.  They think by so doing; they are no longer "legally" accountable as role models of student standards of conduct.

At the very least, the decision  
whether we should introduce students to higher standards of conduct than the law and further, encourage students to embrace them, 
should be made after at least some open and honest public discussion.

The leadership of the APS will not provide for that discussion.  The leadership of the APS will not support the Citizens Advisory Council on Communication and the effort to open two-way communication between the leadership of the APS and the community members they serve.

Whether you ask deferentially or more
insistently, their answer means no.
The leadership of the APS will not allow that discussion in any venue they control.

They have a publicly funded private police force willing to follow their orders to "eject" anyone who pushes the issue.




One moment, peaceful demonstrators quietly hold up posters some of which had to do with opening two-way communication and others having to do with Character Counts!.  Clearly, they are "disrupting" nothing.


Moments later, APS Praetorian Guard rolls on the poster holders,
 giving them the "APS thumb"; you're making them feel
 uncomfortable, you have to leave.
Whether there is community support or not, for character education in public schools should be determined in civil discussion in advance of the school board election and their hiring of;
a superintendent who;
  • is
or
  • is not 
expected to step up as the senior-most administrative role model of the standards s/he establishes and enforces upon nearly 90,000 of this community's sons and daughters in the APS.

If we really want students to grow into adults who embrace character and courage and honor;
somebody has to show them what it looks like
to be held honestly, actually accountable to meaningful standards of conduct and competence
instead of showing them what it looks like
to squander the public trust and treasure in an in secret, cost is no object, effectively oversightless effort to escape the consequences breaking the law; the lowest standards of conduct; the standards of conduct that every higher standard is higher than.



photos Mark Bralley

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Petition to be delivered to the APS Board of Education

We the undersigned, sign in support of the petition;
the timely preparation and presentation of;
A candid, forthright and honest accounting of
ethics, standards and accountability in the APS

(an examination and review of the ethics and standards that apply to APS school board members, 
employees and students, and of the due processes by which those standards are enforced)
 

1. ____________________________

2. ____________________________

3. ____________________________

4. ____________________________

5. ____________________________

6. ____________________________

??? ___________________________

How many signatures would it take, do you think,
before the leadership of the APS finally has to tell the truth?


Marty Esquivel says, it's not about Character Counts!

In the strictest sense, what APS School Board Member Marty Esquivel says is correct; it isn't about Character Counts! per se;  the Pillars of Character Counts! are only one of a number of higher standards of conduct than the law.

The real question is whether Esquivel intends to hold himself honestly accountable to any higher standards of conduct than the law, not just the Pillars of Character Counts!.  It seems unlikely given the enormous amount of money he and the board are spending to escape accountability even to the law.  It is only about Character Counts! because those are the standards unanimously approved by the school board every year in the APS Student Behavior Handbook.

That Esquivel and the board are so unwilling to even talk openly, honestly, and on the record about their standards of conduct and their accountability to them, is a tell*.
*a sign, a behavioral clue that reveals something one tries to hide

They wouldn't have to hide the truth
if the truth didn't need hiding.

The truth is;

the leadership of the APS is not honestly, actually accountable to even run of the mill standards.

Their usurped power and resources enable them escape honest accountability to any standards at all.

Else,
  • they would point to their meaningful standards of conduct and competence, and
  • they would point to the due process by which they are actually and honestly accountable to them.
Ethics, standards and accountability are important issues in the election of school board members and the appointment of a new superintendent.  They are the most important issues because they are the most fundamental issues.

If success is possible;
if we aren't trying to do a thing that can't be done,
then success depends solely upon;
  • the standards of conduct and competence that apply to the people who are responsible for success, and upon
  • their honest and actual accountability to those standards.
    because there isn't one whit of difference between the
    highest standards and the lowest, if there is honest, actual
    accountability to neither.
Ethics, standards and accountability are legitimate issues in the political discourse surrounding the election of school board members and their appointment of the next superintendent.  They are issues that deserve open and honest public discussion; two-way communication between the leadership of the APS and the community members they serve.

APS Ethics, Standards and Accountability will not see open and honest public discussion.

They will not because Marty Esquivel and board have something to hide; an allegation he and they could refute simply and in an instant by pointing to the due process that holds them actually and honestly accountable to meaningful standards of conduct and competence within their public service.

He cannot.  He would if he could.

This is about Character Counts! Board Member Esquivel.

  • It is about Character Counts! because the Pillars of Character Counts!, link, are student standards of conduct and you will not even admit that you are a role model of student standards of conduct.
  • It is about Character Counts! because you and the board have re-established those as the student standards of conduct every year since the board unanimously adopted them in 1994.
  • It is about Character Counts! because you are among the seven senior-most role models of accountability to those standards.  Never mind that no other school board member or senior administrator is any more inclined than you, to step up as an honest to God role model of higher standards of conduct.
It takes character and courage to be held actually and honestly accountable to higher standards of conduct.  It takes more than re-telling a fable about a kid, a hatchet and a cherry tree to encourage students to grow into adults who embrace character and courage and honor.

Character is taught (only) by personal example.

Neither Esquivel, nor any other school board member, nor senior administrator has ever suggested any reason other than
their individual and collective lack of character
and courage
keeping them from stepping up as role models of standards of conduct that require candor, forthrightness and honesty.

As much as ethics, standards and accountability in the APS should be on the table for open and honest discussion, they will not, because Esquivel and the board own the allegiance of the media; an allegation that could could be refuted simply by any one of them; the Journal, KRQE, KOAT, KOB TV, or the Duke City Fix.  All they have to do is just;
1.  point to any investigation and report any one of them has done on ethics, standards and accountability in the APS or,

2.  offering some good and ethical reason why they have not.
Instead, the questions of ethics, standards and accountability are stonewalled.

Stonewalling is explicitly prohibited by the standards of conduct they establish and enforce upon students which preclude the use of;
"... half-truths, out-of-context statements, and even silence, ... intended to create beliefs or leave impressions that are untrue or misleading". (emphasis added)
I would offer that it is fair to say;
  • anyone who won't talk about role modeling has no intention of standing up as one, and
  • anyone who is unwilling to step up as an honest to God role model of accountability to student standards of conduct has no business being on the school board, in the administration, or for that matter, in the classroom.



If;
  • we concede that we need role models of accountability to student standards of conduct if we expect students to hold themselves accountable to them, and
  • there are no adults willing to role model honest accountability to higher standards of conduct, and,
  • we recognize that we must finally end the hypocrisy of two standards of conduct in the APS; a nationally recognized, accepted and respected code of ethical conduct for students and the lowest possible standards for board members and senior administrators;
we must lower student standards of conduct.

We have to lower student standards of conduct to a point low enough that adult role models are comfortable being held honestly and actually accountable to them.

That discussion is newsworthy.  That discussion needs to be held in time to sort school board candidates into one of two piles;
1.  those who will step up as role models of APS student standards of conduct however high and,

2.  those who will not.
In the APS School Board Election, District 4,
  • I am a candidate who will step up without hesitation, and
  • Defendant Marty Esquivel is a candidate who will not.

Charles "ched" MacQuigg
Honest accountability for everybody, including school board members and superintendents, to meaningful standards of conduct and competence within their public service,

Candid, forthright and honest accounting of the spending of
the power and resources that the people entrust to the stewardship of leadership of the APS.  Transparency limited only by the law.

Meaningful participation by interest and stakeholders, in decision making that affects their interests.






photos Mark Bralley

Monday, November 17, 2014

Upon further refection; forget about an independent audit, but only for now.

I am still in favor of annual independent examination and reviews of;

  • Ethics,
  • Standards and
  • Accountability
in the Albuquerque Public Schools, from Kindergarteners to school board members meeting in secret.

There is something we can demand right now,
fully expecting a rather immediate response;
a candid, forthright and honest accounting of Ethics,
Standards and Accountability in the APS.
All of the ethics, standards and accountability that exist in the APS, exist in public records; policies and procedural directives.  They are immediately available.

If applicable ethics, standards and accountability are not immediately available in public records, it would be fair to ask, why are they not?

How can they be actually honestly accountable
  • to ethics and standards they can't immediately find,
  • by processes they can't immediately find either?
What would happen if the leadership of the APS was asked to create just such public record?
A candid, forthright and honest accounting
of ethics, standards and accountability
in the Albuquerque Public Schools
I can tell you exactly what would
happen and rather immediately.

The leadership of the APS, the board,
administration and their lawyers, will
tell APS Public Records Custodian and
Communications Director Rigo Chavez
to send a letter explaining that the NM
Inspection of Public Records Act does
not "require" APS to "create a public record."

Interestingly, APS' student standards of
conduct; established by the board and enforced by the supt,
require students, at the expense of the forfeiture of their good character, to expect from themselves,
more than the law requires and less than the law allows.


I can tell you what else will (not)
happen,  Journal Editor in Chief
Kent Walz will not have a reporter
assigned to investigate and report
upon ethics, standards and
accountability in the APS.

Nor will any news director at any
NM Broadcasters Assoc Affiliate
TV stations in town.


Creating such a record,
one would think, would
fall reasonably within the
duties of an "Executive
Director" of Communications
such as Monica Armenta.

One would think she could be expected to put together a candid, forthright and honest accounting of ethics, standards and accountability in APS because that's what we pay her $111K a year to do;
communicate.




photos Mark Bralley

Susana Martinez reneged on accountability pledge

It is apparently alright for campaigning politicians to deliberately mislead people.

It is alright to spend millions and millions of dollars openly and shameless to create beliefs or leave impressions that are untrue or misleading.

Supposedly, it is not alright for them to continue to deliberately mislead the people once they are elected, though of course they do.  To the extent that their silence gives consent, the people are good with that.

The people's oversight over government, politicians and public servants is provided by the government.  If you want to know how politicians and public servants are spending public resources and wielding power that belongs fundamentally to the people, they will tell you.

If you would like to hear it from someone else,
someone who is not conflicted by their own self interests,
you're out of luck.

Yes, yes, yes I would
When Gov Susana Martinez was running for office, I asked her, in essence, if she would support independent investigations of government looking for waste due to corruption and incompetence and authorize the investigators to report directly to the public record and not only to those whose character and competence were under investigation.

I couldn't get the questions out of my mouth without being interrupted;
"yes", "yes", "yes", "yes I would." link
Of course she never has.

Has there ever been an independent examination and review of ethics, standards and accountability in any government agency?

I propose that before we elect new APS school board members, before we hire another superintendent, there be;
an independent examination and review of 
the ethics, standards and accountability that 
protect the public interests in the public schools.
Why not?

Why not now?

... except that any honest examination and review would find inadequate records of inadequate accountability to inadequate standards of conduct and competence.

Suppose just for the hell of it; there is actually
adequate record keeping of adequate accountability to 
adequate standards of conduct and competence.
Suppose there is honest accountability to meaningful standards of conduct and competence; where is the evidence of them?

Why, if you search APS' award winning website for Executive and Administrative Standards of Conduct and Competence you find nothing, link?

Why can't you link to due process for complaints filed against board members or administrators?

... except that they don't exist?

Demand a timely independent examination and review of APS executive and administrative ethics, standards and accountability.

Demand that the findings be ethically redacted and surrendered to public knowledge.

How, where, when?

Glad you asked;
  • the public forum
  • at the APS school board meeting
  • Wednesday, November 19, 2014, agenda



photo Mark Bralley