Testing the character of APS administrators and Board Members

Curious about whether or not any particular administrator or
board member is a person of character and courage?

Ask him or her, whether or not they would be willing to
hold themselves honestly accountable as a role model
of the Student Standard of Conduct,
for the few hours each day the they enforce that standard
of conduct upon students.

If they say yes,
then they are a person of character and courage.

If they say no, then obviously, they are not.

Any answer except yes, means no.

No, is not an acceptable answer to that question

• from the senior most public servants in the APS, and
• from the senior most stewards of the public trust and treasure in the APS, and
  
• certainly not from the senior most role models in the APS.

There is no reason to eschew accountability as a role model,
except a lack of character and courage.

If there were, someone could point to it.
If there were, someone would point to it.

An additional and equally effective test question;

Would you support an immediate, impartial, full scale,
forensic audit of the entire leadership of the APS?

Any answer except yes, means no.


There is no reason to oppose an audit except to protect the corrupt and the incompetent from the consequences of their corruption and their incompetence.

No one in the leadership of the APS has anything to fear from an audit, except the corrupt and the incompetent.

If there were any good and ethical reason at all
not to commence an administrative accountability audit
someone could point to it;

someone would point to it.