"letters to the editor" find the round file?

One reader says his letters (about APS and the Chinese fire drill of principals) to the editor are routinely ignored. If you read letters to the editor; you will find few to none, that are critical of the problems in the leadership of the APS.

Yet yesterday, when KKOB's Jim Villanucci opened up the phone lines for community input, there was two solid hours of callers railing on the leadership of the APS. Not one caller defended the principal swap.

There seems to be a disconnect.

It appears that the Journal is taking a active role in misleading the community regarding the conduct and competence of the leadership of the public schools.

Neither the Journal nor the Trib will tell their readers;

• the leadership of the APS rewrote their code of conduct. They are no longer accountable to the student standard of conduct. They abdicated as senior role models for the student standard of conduct.
• they will not surrender an honest accounting of spending in the uptown administrative complex.
• they will not surrender public records of the investigations into public corruption and criminal conspiracy in the administration of the APS Police.
• they will not surrender an honest accounting of the relationship between APS and the Modral law firm.
• they have deliberately falsified the records of as many as a dozen board meetings and then broadcast them to the community on ch 96.
• they no longer will allow citizens to ask questions of them, on the record. they have moved the public forum off of the public record.
• they are using public funds, unwitting taxpayer support of "education", to fund litigation to escape accountability to the Inspection of Public Records Act.
• they are covering up the results of an impartial investigation of their chief of police, Gil Lovato.
• they are opposing an impartial (forensic) accountability audit of the entire leadership of the APS.
• they are stonewallling the NMAGO's request for their records on the complaint that has been filed against them.
  

How can anyone, at this point, not see that the leadership of the APS, the Journal, and the Trib, have a shared, covert agenda that is not in the public interest?