The leaderhip of the APS will not engage

in a candid, forthright, and honest discussion of;

1. administrative role modeling of the student standard of conduct.
2. administrative standards of conduct, competency, and accountability
3. the need for an immediate aggressive forensic audit of the entire leadership of the APS

because

The inevitable outcome of such discussions would be;

1. Administrators would find themselves honestly accountable as role models of the standards of conduct and competence that they enforce upon students and staff; and,
2. There would be meaningful standards of conduct and competence, and those standards would be enforced by a system powerful enough to hold them accountable even against their will; and,
3. There would be an immediate audit that would identify by name, every administrator and board member who had betrayed the public trust with their corruption and their incompetence.

They are permitted the luxury of refusing to entertain a candid, forthright and honest discussion of legitimate issues by;

1. their arrogance, and by
2. the failure of stakeholders to rise in opposition, and by
3. the media*, which is keeping the story from stakeholders.

I blame the leadership of the APS for their arrogance, and for their abuse and betrayal of the public trust;

I blame the local media for the fact that so few stakeholders know the truth, and are thereby denied their right to defend their interests in their public schools.

In particular, I blame;

* Thomas H Lang,
Kent Walz,
Michelle Donaldson,
Mary Lynn Roper, and
Rhonda Aubrey