Carraro "scandal" hits Journal front page.

I am not a stupid man. I read the article link sub req
and cannot say for certain whether or not Carraro acquitted
himself or not. It seems so, but the tone of the article was
too accusatory to dismiss.

Which means the Journal introduced lingering doubt about
the character of Joe Carraro.

At the same time, the Journal will offer no coverage of the
very real scandal involving Darren White and the illegal use
of public resources on his watch.

Giving White a political advantage over Carraro.

Deliberately creating no doubt about the character
of Darren White.

And of Thomas J Lang, and of Kent Walz.