Silence gives consent.

According to an online legal dictionary; link

Pure and simple, silence cannot be considered as consent
to a contract, except in cases where the silent person
is bound in good faith to explain himself; in which case
silence gives consent.

When a person is accused of a crime or charged with any fact,
and he does not deny it, in general, the presumption is very strong
that the charge is correct.

Are school board members bound in good faith, to explain
why due process is being denied to two whistleblower complaints?

Board policy link, requires the board to;

"... review and recommend approval or action(s)
associated with ... any whistleblower complaints."

I have repeatedly alleged that the complaints have been
denied due process for no reason except to excuse
Winston Brooks from circumstances where he will have to
admit on the record, that administrative and executive
role modeling of the Student Standards of Conduct is
a fairy tale.

The language is specific and unequivocal, the complaints
have been denied due process, and the school board
will not go on the record with a justification for their denial
of due process for those complaints.