It is time to call the question

"If debate has dragged on longer than you feel is really warranted, you can “call the question,” at which time the chair has to immediately ask those assembled to vote to determine whether or not debate should be cut off or continue. The motion to call the question is itself not debatable. If two-thirds of those voting agree that the discussion should have died some time ago, they will support the call. Then, and only then, will the vote be taken on the question itself." unk

And the question is;

Shall there be an immediate impartial (forensic) accountability audit of the leadership of the APS?

Yea?, ...or nay?

There has been no debate on the issue of an audit.
The position in opposition to an audit, is indefensible;
those who oppose the audit have not argued their position. Instead they have stonewalled the question.

Never the less, it is fair to call the question.

If Marty Esquivel moved;

That the board of education order Beth Everitt,
as a condition of her continued employment,
to commission an immediate impartial audit
of her administration of the APS.

and Gordon Rowe seconded the motion.

Then every member of the board would be compelled to make a public statement about their position on the real question;

will the leadership of the APS be held accountable to a meaningful standard of conduct, by a system over which they have no control; and even against their will?


or not?