Tuesday, April 24, 2007

transparency

The leadership of the APS claims transparency. If you ask Beth Everitt if her administration is transparent; she will say that it is.

I would argue that for as long as she refuses to answer legitimate questions on the record, she can not claim credit for transparency in even its smallest measure.

She cannot claim any transparency at all for as long as she stonewalls legitimate questions.

  • Why are you no longer accountable to the student standard of conduct?
  • Why will you not provide a candid, honest, and forthright accounting of the uptown administrative complex?
  • Why will you not surrender the truth about public corruption and criminal conspiracy in the administration of the APS Police; and by extension the administration of the entire APS?
  • Why will you not commission a (forensic) audit of the public interests in the APS?

No comments: