It has been three months now,
since David Robbins put administrative
and executive rolemodeling of the
Student Standards of Conduct,
on the table for an open and
honest discussion.
He suggested restoring the role
modeling clause to the standards
of conduct that apply to board
members and administrators.
The clause reads;
In no case, shall the standards of conduct for an adult,
be lower than the standards of conduct for students.
Policy Committee Chair, David Peercy has had three
months to put the subject back on the table.
He will not.
The only excuse that he has offered, is that he wants to review
all policies simultaneously, which takes some time.
He has had time enough. It is going on four months now,
and he has had plenty of time to do anything he needed to do
before beginning the discussion again.
The simple truth is that he is stalling.
He is stalling to prevent an open and honest discussion of
standards and accountability in the leadership of the APS.
David Peercy is stalling in an effort prevent the illumination
of the ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership
of the APS.
He will not allow any discussion that would place any of the
good ol' boys in the position of having to admit the truth.
The truth is;
There is not one of them who will admit that they have
any obligation at all to be a role model of the Student
Standards of Conduct in the only way that they can be
role modeled;by holding themselves honestly accountable to
the Pillars of Character Counts!
There is not one of them who will stand up and declare their
honest accountability to the Pillars of Character Counts!
link
The leadership of the APS, the senior most role models of
the Student Standards of Conduct,
have abdicated as role models.
David Peercy intends to stonewall the issue, rather than
allowing stakeholders to learn the truth.
Stonewalling is dishonest, and therefore unethical.
Students are told that they stonewall, at the expense of
their good character.
photos Mark Bralley
No comments:
Post a Comment