Rep. Janice Arnold-Jones
has "office hours" on
Saturday mornings at the
Southwest Learning Center.
Part of the meeting is a
non-partisan discussion
of current issues.
It is a largely conservative
group that respects every
other point of view.
The goal is to gain
understanding.
The other half is more dedicated to our Republican needs, including the need to define ourselves as Republicans, of a kind that we can be proud.
We have decided that we share at least one value that defines us all and that is the belief that our government should be transparently accountable to us.
In the world of politics and elections, a great deal depends on choosing exactly the right words to use. We have been using "transparent accountability" for so long that we are wondering if they have become hackneyed.
So what are the right words for "transparent accountability"?
If by transparent we mean; every aspect of the spending of our power and resources is done with our full knowledge. No secrets about the spending of the public trust and treasure should be kept secret from us except as provided for by the spirit of the law, due process, and common sense.
And if by accountable we mean; if we see something that violates a standard that we have established for our servants, a complaint can be filed, and that complaint will see a principled resolution; it will see due process. The least powerful should be able to file a complaint against the most powerful, and then fully expect that the complaint will see due process.
Inescapable accountability to unequivocal standards.
Socrates was only partly right when he concluded that "absolute power corrupts absolutely". It is not power that corrupts, but temptation; the temptation presented when people figure out that they have so much power,
that they can no longer be held accountable for abusing it.
Accountability is fatal to corruption and incompetence. If 100% accountability were possible, it would be 100% fatal to 100% of corruption, 100% of the time.
There is no legitimate agenda of any party or person, that does not move forward on the day that public servants are honestly accountable to meaningful standards of conduct and competence within their public service.
NM State Auditor Hector Balderas said that he has not been given the resources that he needs to keep 3-5% of the budget from being wasted every year.
He said if his Office were given the necessary resources, he could save taxpayers between $120M and $240M a year, over and above the cost of making impossibly difficult to hide corruption; tax dollars that could be better spent; or returned to tax payers.
It is possible to make it impossibly difficult to hide corruption.
It is possible to make accountability inescapable.
The question is not how it can be done.
The question is will it be done.
Corruption and incompetence exist in our government, only because we allow them.
The only thing standing between New Mexico riddled with corruption, and New Mexico, the free world model for transparently accountable government, is a relative hand full of good ol' boys who like things the way they are.
All we need to do is name them, and then throw their asses out.
The answer is transparent accountability to meaningful standards of conduct and competence within public service.
The problem is how to get voters to understand that,
and then act upon that understanding;
... in two or three carefully chosen words.
photos Mark Bralley
Saturday, July 11, 2009
What's another word for transparent?
Posted by ched macquigg at 9:10 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Though I usually vote Democrat, I have a great deal of respect for John McCain, for many reasons.
Lately, when it came to light that Dick Cheney allegedly ordered CIA to mislead congress, John McCain made a non-confrontational request for Cheney to come forth and speak on the matter, to be "transparent".
Many Republicans disrespected McCain after he lost to Obama.... but he proved himself to be the ever professional gentleman and continues to fight for what he believes in, and to support the positive things the Republican party has based itself on. He has also obviously modeled that for his children, as they are staunch Republicans, respectful of President Obama, yet want to see the Republican party modernize and include young people and fresh ideas.
So I would humbly ask Republicans to look at John McCain and his family. Look at their ideals and their strong, yet polite professional behavior. The McCain's don't DEMAND respect, they EARN it.So please remember what John McCain wanted for this party, and how he used ethical behavior to bring that about. Let's bring more of that to New Mexico.
You left out an important component of accountability. We need whistleblower protection in New Mexico, so employees bringing complaints are protected from retaliation. The legislature hasn't passed that, either.
By the way, why do so many of your commenters chooses to be anonymous, even though what they are saying isn't controversial, like the comment before mine about McCain? Maybe they don't know how to use that part of the comment mechanism.
Sorry Michelle, it is just that we work for APS and it's atmosphere of retaliation.
I was going to say the same thing. I work for APS too. Even if I post a comment about non-APS related, I'll probably go on a "list" (it's been done before).
I tried to "whistleblow on APS using my chain of command because teenage girls were getting "touched" and talked sexually by a vice-principal. In the end, nothing happens to him, and I got my ass handed to me. Even the parents encountered roadblocks in APS, APD and state ethics office in this situation. Non-APS APD tried to help, but APS-APD took over and the complaint simply went away.
Then,...the wrath of APS came upon me. My evalvs went from wonderful to horrible, and I got the first letters in my file for BS things after 9 years of no complaints. Then, the worst...that VP went after my students to prove to me that he was empowered, abd somehow to show that I was a "lax" teacher.
So everyone is a potential target in APS, but especially instructors.
Post a Comment