Audit implications

Consider the implications of an audit of the APS.

A full scale forensic audit of the leadership of the APS.

It would cost some money. If 50 grand isn't the right number
let me know.

There are two possibilities;

one; we get our money's worth and more than 50 grand in ongoing corruption is exposed.

or two; we lose money because there is less than 50 grand in ongoing corruption.

All you have to do is believe that less than 50 grand;
in a billion dollar a year budget, is being stolen.

The Meyners Audit said senior administrators were spending
more than 50 large, at a whack,
"... without involving purchasing."

All the while ignoring purchasing guidelines and hanging
out at the Inn of the Mountain Gods.

Honestly,
if there is only $50,000 unaccounted for;
I'm a Chinese sea cook.

So why isn't Paula Maes Modrall going to allow an audit
that names names?


And what about the next most powerful and trusted
public servants? What are they doing?

Are they saying;

"Hey, Ched's full of shit. Nothing's wrong."

"Nothing is being hidden."

"There is no need for a forensic audit."

No.
They're just stonewalling the question.

Are they not co-conspirators at some point, of those who's
record of public service cannot survive an audit?

Full scale forensic audit.

Now.