Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Michael Locksley suspension raises question about Kreb's call.

UNM Athletic Director Paul Krebs made a bad call.
When it was up to him to determine the consequences for
his head football coach when said coach clocked an assistant
coach, Krebs decided that written and verbal reprimands
were consequence enough.

When the case was reviewed outside the influence of the good
ol' boys in the Athletic Department, a more severe consequence
was deemed appropriate; a one game suspension (presumably
without pay, but you never can tell).

UPDATE: 10 day suspension without pay.

Either the Human Resources department at UNM over punished
Locksley, or Krebs under punished him. Considering there were
at least a few clambering for an outright firing, not to mention
criminal prosecution, the HR response seems the more appropriate.

Good ol' boy Krebs under punished good ol' boy Locksley.

Krebs likely will not be penalized for his bad call.

It's just not the way they roll.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I believe the same coach was on the news last night for a sexual harassment lawsuit concerning a UNM staffer or UNM student.
She was insanely mad, but suddenly changed her mind and became all roses and fluff and dismissed the charges and "promised to still be a loyal fan at every game".
Can you say "payoff"?

Anonymous said...

It was Locksley that was accused of sexual harassment.
The story can be found at:
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4217083

Another fat-ass, abusive loser promoted beyond his ability in NM!

The Journal got it right: switch around Veronica "Useless & inaccessable" Garcia, Winston "Charlie Brown" Brooks and Michael "Fat Ass" Locksley in their respective positions, and you still have the same quality of leader!

Anonymous said...

We care about the Lobos winning and getting support, not what it causes tax payers.