Is it fair to hold Winston Brooks responsible?

APS' Custodian of Public Records, Rigo Chavez
has a record of obfuscating the surrender of public records
to public knowledge.

He has a record of ignoring simple requests for information.
I have asked three times now, for the name of the private
investigation firm that conducted the investigation of the
public corruption and criminal conspiracy in the leadership
of the APS (police dept). He is yet to surrender the truth.

So is Winston Brooks ultimately responsible for this effort to hide the truth from stakeholders?

I would argue that he is. It is difficult to imagine Rigo Chavez as rogue administrator trampling company policy and state law,

in order to cover the asses of the likes of Beth Everitt,
Tom Savage, and Gil Lovato.

And Darren White.

So is it Winston Brooks' will, that
Rigo Chavez hide the truth from public knowledge?

I think it is.

It would be consistent with Winston Brooks' steadfast refusal
to stand still and answer legitimate questions about the public interest, candidly, forthrightly, and honestly.

Winston Brooks is totally responsible for APS' failure to be honest with stakeholders.

The buck stops on Winston's Brooks' desk.



cc Winston Brooks upon posting, at superintendent(at)aps.edu