Monica Armenta's Public Service, Is It Corrupt?

Monica Armenta's public service is a public resource;
and as such, must serve the public interest.

Monica Armenta's public service does not include telling the truth about the public interests, in the public schools. Ipso facto, her public service is against the public interests.

It is categorically against the public interest, to deny the public, answers to legitimate questions about their interests in the public schools.

When public resources are used against the public interest;
it can only be for one or both of two reasons;
incompetence and/or corruption.

Monica Armenta's public service does not include scheduling a town hall meeting where she will answer legitimate questions about the public interests; honestly, candidly, and forthrightly. Which is against public interests, and is therefore corrupt or incompetent.

Unless one believes that Monica Armenta, in her capacity as a public servant, is simply unable to schedule such a meeting, and therefore incompetent;

One has to accept that the reason, that there will never be a town hall meeting, is corrupt.

If Monica Armenta's public service is beyond her control;
if she is "only following orders";



... her public service is no less corrupt.



Armenta has been offered an opportunity to refute or rebut this post.