C. Consideration for Approval of an Administrative Audit (Discussion/Action)

The administrative accountability audit is on the agenda for the board meeting this afternoon.

The audit is a pivotal decision that will have a profound and lasting effect on the future of the APS.

After the decision, APS will be lead by individuals who are accountable for their professional conduct and competence.

Or, APS will be lead by the same good ole boys club; insulated and immune to the consequences of their corruption and incompetence.

The Journal and Tribune, by and through Charlie Moore and Bill Slakey, fully support the corrupt and incompetent in the leadership of the APS. They are committed to protecting their interests by suppressing the truth.

There is no other explanation for their deliberate refusal to inform stakeholders about a decision that will affect their interests.

There is only one reason to hide the truth.
It means something, if the only thing you can do is stonewall.

Even the most staunch supporters of the leadership of the APS will not deny that the administration of the APS is hiding corrupt and incompetent public servants. Any honest audit of the leadership of the APS will expose corruption and incompetence.

Monica Armenta, for all of her hundred thousand dollar bag of tricks, cannot find a way to spin a truth worse than the lie. She can't tell the truth; and there isn't a lie, that can survive even the most superficial scrutiny.

The corrupt and the incompetent in the leadership of the APS will fight against an audit like their jobs depended on it.

Charlie Moore and Bill Slakey will help them hide the truth from stakeholders with an equivalent vigor.

This shameful, and shameless betrayal of trust ends with an audit.

The audit begins the day after those who believe that the leadership of the APS should be accountable to meaningful standards of conduct and competence

finally show up at a board meeting
in numbers too big to ignore.