APS Policy Chair David Peercy, clueless or corrupt?

APS' Policy and Instruction
Committee meets tomorrow.

David Peercy continues to
refuse to allow the open and
honest discussion of
administrative and executive
role modeling of the student
standards of conduct.

His refusal is based on his belief
that the leadership of the APS
is actually accountable to the law,
and that the law is a higher
standard of conduct than the
student standards of conduct;
a nationally recognized, accepted, and respected code of ethics.

Peercy suffers from at least three boggles;

1. He would have us believe that the leadership of the APS is actually accountable to the law, despite their incontrovertible record of litigating for themselves; exception to the law.

2. He fails to comprehend the dishonorable and dishonest and unethical conduct that even real accountability to the law allows, and

3. He fails to comprehend the honorable, honest and ethical conduct that codes of ethics require.

His position is indefensible by any means except hiding it;
stonewalling.

His actions are

cowardly, unethical, dishonorable, and seemingly, corrupt.

And not much different from the actions of the rest of the
leadership of the APS;

cowardly, unethical, dishonorable, and seemingly, corrupt.

photo Mark Bralley