"... there won't be a single APS senior administrator left standing."

When APS Police Chief Gil Lovato was put on paid administrative leave following the revelation of evidence of felony criminal misconduct by APS senior administrators, link, he said he was ready to go to court and when he was done "telling the truth","... there won't be a single APS senior administrator left standing."

Lovato really didn't want to go to court of course; he was complacent or complicit in the burial of every body he threatened to dig up. But the prospect of the truth coming out in court and in the public record, was more than APS Modrall could bear, so they just put him on leave for half a year to keep him quiet and out of court.

You might ask yourself, why is it that the leadership of the APS can't fire a senior administrator ever, without giving them a boot full of cash and paid leave?

It is because of what they will reveal in court. You don't get to be an APS senior administrator without knowing where more than a few bodies are buried.

If the truth in the Caswell Report is ever made public,
there won't be a single APS senior administrator left standing.
If there is justice, there won't be an incumbent school board member left sitting.

If the truth in the COSO Report is ever made public,
there won't be a single APS senior administrator or incumbent
board member left sitting. That, if they are held honestly
accountable for their complicity in, or complacency about,
the ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS.

If the leadership of the APS could furnish one public record that
substantially controverts anything I have written, they would.

They cannot furnish even one independent investigation of
administrative and executive standards and accountability,
that demonstrates the adequacy of either.

There is an ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership
of the APS.

If there is not, why can't they prove it with independent review?

It is time for a review and analysis of APS audits. I propose the audit cover the last 12 years; the time this year's seniors have been students in the APS.

I propose auditors look for evidence of recurring issues and failures to address audit findings with meaningful standards and accountability.

I propose that they publish their ethically redacted findings in the public record. And further, that their conclusions be written in plain English.

The only reason that anyone in the leadership of the APS would oppose such review, analysis, and publication, is to cover up public corruption and incompetence in the leadership of the APS.

The only reason the Journal, KRQE, KOAT, and KOB TV, are not investigating the cover up, is because they are (at least tacitly) part of it. My opinion, there complicity and complacency is way more than tacit.