on the courthouse scandal

had there been an honest and impartial audit of the construction, the corruption and incompetence would have been immediately exposed.

if aragon et al, knew that there was going to be an audit of their performance at the end of the construction , an audit beyond their undue influence, an audit even against their will;

they would not have even tried to get away with what they did.

corruption and incompetence exist only because their system hides them.

transparent accountability is fatal to corruption and incompetence.

that is why the corrupt and incompetent will never provide for transparent accountability; it is not in their interests.

if they had been asked to provide for an impartial audit, they would have said no.

there is only one reason to oppose impartial audits. the only reason to oppose an audit is prevent the exposure of corruption and incompetence; the incompetent and the corrupt.

there was not an impartial audit of the courthouse.

there will not be an impartial audit of the aps uptown administrative complex.

for exactly the same reasons.

the leadership of the aps has decided that their "courthouse" will not be audited.

and because they enjoy the privilege of self exception to accountability; they cannot be compelled to explain, defend, or even acknowledge that they have made that decision.

as the journal and trib continue to aid and abet.

do you suppose the journal and trib ignored pleas to investigate and report upon corruption in the building of the courthouse?

just like they are ignoring pleas to investigate and report upon the rip off of taxpayers at the uptown administrative retirement complex?