gil lovato, cindy west, and the independent investigation of public corruption in the leadership of the aps

take a look at krqe news reports here and here and then you be the judge;

did the leadership of the aps tell lovato and west that they did not have to cooperate with the investigation of the public corruption in the leadership of the aps police department?

if they did, their action is contrary to the public interests. they are elected and hired to protect public interests in the public schools.

how can senior public servants openly oppose fact finding in the investigation of public corruption?