why is it such a poor source of information?
why is it not archived?
who is responsible for such a user unfriendly resource?
these are not new questions, nor are they only mine.
how will the website get better if no one will stand up and either defend it, or accept accountability for its shortcomings.
if no one will admit that there is anything wrong with the site; they can hardly be believed when they claim to be invested in improving it.
the issue is old enough to be have been addressed.
they are stonewalling.
Thursday, March 01, 2007
aps' website (rewrite)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment