Or, in the alternative;
why won't the Journal write that there isn't corruption and incompetence in the leadership of the APS?
Why is the quality of the standards not newsworthy?
Why is the system of accountability not newsworthy?
Why won't the Journal/Kent Walz assure us that
there is honest accountability to meaningful standards of conduct and competence in the leadership of the APS?
if they honestly is, and then
show us the proof that there is, if there is actually any.
If there actually is
inescapable accountabilitythey could be pointing to it;
to unequivocal standards of conduct and
competence in the leadership of the APS;
they should be pointing to it;
they would be pointing to it.
Right?
No comments:
Post a Comment