Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Negative campaigns; or not?

That question begs the question; who decided on that premise?

The servant rode the master.

A servant does not define the terms of servitude.

Why are the public servants defining the terms of public service?

The consensus among voters will determine what a campaign looks like.

When was it decided, by whom was it decided, that you could ask for someone’s vote and never look them in the eye?

Candidates will stand and deliver on any legitimate question or defend their refusal.


Sez who?

In the next election, will the servant again mount the master? Looks like.

No comments: