Tax Dollars Continue to Flow to Modrall

Taxpayers, through their unwitting support of "education" are paying lawyers from the school board president's law firm, to supervise the surrender of public records to me.

George McFall, works for Modrall and is paid to read every request for public records that I submit. On its face, that's creepy. The requests are also reviewed by Linda Sink. You would suppose that she could find at least one other thing more important to do, than involve herself in my public records requests. Rigo Chavez is paid to be APS' Custodian of Public Records.

The custodian of public records, is the only of these three public servants who is reasonably involved. (McFall and Modrall are public servants insofar as their lips are one with the publics' teat.)

The hundreds of dollars per hour that the public pays McFall and Sink to review my requests for public records, is unjustifiable. It is a waste of tax dollars. It is proof of poor stewardship of the billion tax dollars that flow through the leadership of the APS every year.


So why are they doing it?


Clearly my requests for public records pose a threat.

The search for the truth represents a threat;

a threat so ominous as to require the involvement
of APS/Modrall's heaviest hitters. (on the public dime)


There is only one reason to hide the truth.


Why do you think that the leadership APS/Modrall
is threatened by the truth?

Don't you wonder just a little
what is really going on in secret?

Why do Thomas J Lang , and the Journal, refuse
to investigate and report upon the ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS?


Why won't anyone just answer the question on the record?

Can the leadership of the APS demonstrate by their record,

that they accountable for their conduct and competence as public servants;

• to meaningful standards of conduct and competence
  
• by a system over which they have no control
• and even against their will?

If the answer is no,
they they are accountable for neither their conduct
nor their competence.

If the answer is yes;

they wouldn't be hiding their record.



Any answer except yes, is no.



Stonewalling means; no.



Their answer is no.


tap, tap, tap, can anyone hear me?
Is this mike turned on? Hello?
Hello test test

...test.