Richardson sez "(Denish) is going to have to separate herself from me."

Governor Bill Richardson,
in an interview for Stateline.org,
link, joined the chorus of
those pointing to the need for
Lt Governor Diane Denish
explain her relationship
to one of the shadiest
administrations in memory.




Did Denish have guilty knowledge of the corruption swirling around her?

The words complicit or complacent have been suggested.
They resonate in the vacuum of a contradictory response
from Denish.

Denish is yet to explain, defend, deny, or even acknowledge
her failure to declare war on public corruption in Santa Fe.

Did she know about the scale of the public corruption and incompetence in Santa Fe?

If Denish didn't know, why won't she admit it and explain why she did not? What has changed that she will be able to ferret out corruption and incompetence now, that she could not before?

If Denish did know, why won't she admit it and explain why she did not blow the whistle on the squandering of our trust and treasure? What has changed that she would now be willing to protect the public interests now, that she would not before?

Instead, she stonewalls the issue because,
the only defense of an indefensible position is to hide it.

Lt Gov Diane Denish;
complicit in, or complacent about,
the Rot in the Roundhouse.

If not complicit or complacent,
then what,

... exactly?




photos Mark Bralley