why it is that, legislators in santa fe are making the decision about whether or not committee meetings will continue to be secreted from the public?
from a public corruption and competence perspective, it is hard to defend letting that decision be made by those who have the most to gain from secrecy;
secrecy in public service and government is never in the public interest.
they have diametrically opposite functions.
more importantly, in a can't see the forest for the trees kind of way;
who writes the terms of public service in the first place,
the public or the public servants?
there is no greater proof that you have lost control over your power and resources than the fact that;
you can not order your servant to stand on the record and answer your questions about their stewardship of your power and resources.
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
tell me again please
Posted by ched macquigg at 2:15 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment