many of modrall's millions

are tax dollars funneled to them by the leadership of the aps. they represent unwitting taxpayer support for the "education" of their children, being used for an entirely different purpose. instead they are being spent enabling administrators and board members to dodge accountability for their non, mis, and malfeasance.

which brings up more than a few questions.

assume a public servant, acting within their public service, breaks the law. should taxpayers then pay for their legal defense; enabling them to dodge accountability for their misconduct and their betrayal of the public trust?

should tax dollars be used to buy immunity for senior administrators from allegations of felony criminal misconduct committed within their public service?

is it appropriate for their lawyers, paid by taxpayers, to defend them at any cost? and even when that defense does not serve the public interests?

is it appropriate for a public servant, for instance school board president paula maes, to see her own household income benefit from these win at any cost defenses, conducted at her board's behest, and which are provided by her husband's law firm?

is there a reason that the amount of money that aps funnels into the modrall law firm is a secret that won't be revealed even in response to a request for public records?

of course there is.

that reason and other relevant details will remain secret as well;
at the insistence of maes and her lawyers from modrall;

and against the public interest.