Saturday, February 24, 2007

robert lucero; guilty knowledge?

robert lucero would have his constituents believe;


he and the other members of the board had no knowledge of the fact that beth everitt planned to spend a million dollars renovating the bottom floor of uptown centre; including renovation for an unnecessary board room.

he and the board were unaware of the blatant and egregious misallocation of public resources, as daily,
they walked past and through, the construction of a palace.

which begs the question; why not?

he, and the other members of the board are elected
for the exact purpose of guarding our trust and treasure.

how can his failing to do so, be his excuse for failing to do so?

a great deal of money is being spent in locations where there are no students.

in fact, there is no place in the aps further from a classroom;
than the offices on the top floor of uptown centre.


when people pay fifty cents for a journal or trib;
is it not a reasonable expectation to have bought
the truth about the uptown centre?

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

What kind of reporting is APS required to do, and to whom? Have they done it? How should the requirements be changed, and how is this done?

ched macquigg said...

how can anyone get an answer to any of these questions from anyone in the aps?

ched macquigg said...

transparency fixes everything; but can only be institutionalized by those who existence depends on avoiding it.

Anonymous said...

The new District 4 school board member, Marty Esquivel, seems interested in this. He is a lawyer with experience in Open Government issues. Have you talked to him about getting this information?

ched macquigg said...

I hope that I don't put the kiss of death on Mr. Esquivel by saying so, but my impression so far is that he is a man of integrity and intelligence.

I am just afraid that might not be enough