"Sometimes circumstances make it necessary to restate the obvious" unk

there is only one thing that will positively end waste in the administration of the public interests in the aps;
an impartial and public audit.

the results of the last audit read;
...administrative evaluations are subjective and unrelated to promotions or step placement...
(read,good ole boy club) and,
...the culture of the aps is one of fear of retribution and retaliation... (read, an administratively corrupt, publicly funded, private police force.)

because the results were not revealed to the public;
nothing was done;
heads did not roll.

if an impartial and public audit is not begun,
who will stand up on the record and repudiate the obvious need?
paula maes? beth everitt? modrall?

no one will stand up and repudiate the need for the audit.
the position is indefensible. they can only stonewall.

the fundamental privilege of the privileged class is that one cannot be compelled to defend, explain, or even acknowledge their privilege. one simply ignores the question.

how can public servants refuse to hold them selves accountable to any meaningful standard of conduct; and then stonewall the question?

how can they simply refuse to tell the truth about the new boardroom?

will there, or will there not, be an immediate and public audit of the administration of the public interests and resources in the aps?