Sunday, October 13, 2013

Esquivel lies again, this time before a federal court judge

In Defendant Marty Esquivel's Motion for Summary Judgment, he made a claim that is an outright lie.  All of his motions are characterized by a profound lack of honesty, but I point to this one in particular because it is so demonstrably, unequivocally dishonest.
The claim is based on Esquivel's sworn testimony, and reads;

"(During my public forum appearance on November 4, 2009, I made) allegations that a particular senior APS administrative official, who was not present, had engaged in criminal behavior."
What I actually said;
I have come tonight with individual opportunities to stand up as role models of the Pillar of Trustworthiness.
Ms. Sink (the administrator who was not present) can tell the truth about ...(ejection begun)
I was going to say;
"Ms. Sink (in order to take advantage of an opportunity to stand up as a role model of trustworthiness) can tell the truth about student discipline and the effects of chronically disruptive students."
I was not allowed to complete my thought.  Even if I had I been, I would not have had accused her of having engaged in criminal behavior.  It was enough to point out that she had not yet told interest holders the truth about the problems consequent to students misbehaving in APS schools.

Saying that I accused her of engaging in criminal behavior, is a bald faced lie.

See for yourself at 1:30.

So who are you going to believe, Marty Esquivel or your lyin' eyes and ears?

Unfortunately bald faces lies come easy for APS School Board President, NM FOG Vice President, and self proclaimed "open government expert", Defendant Marty Esquivel, link, link; the senior most role model in the entire APS, of the student standard on truth telling, the Pillar of Trustworthiness.

This is newsworthy, as is;
  • The removal of the role modeling clause In no case shall the standards of conduct for adults, be lower than the standards of conduct for students, from APS school board policy and their own code of conduct.  And in the so doing, their wholesale abandonment of the duties and obligations of the senior most role models of student standards of conduct, and
  • the abject lack of due process for complaints filed against administrators and board members, and
  • their refusal to produce a candid forthright and honest accounting of their spending at the Castle Keep at 6400 Uptown Blvd, and
  • their refusal to produce and discuss, statistics on student misconduct, past, present and future, and the effects of chronically disruptive students, and
  • their refusal to recognize the nearly 100,000 years of teaching experience in the APS by providing for them, a seat at the table where decisions are made, and
  • their refusal to allow any audit of administrative and executive standards and accountability, in particular if that audit, review, investigation and report will individually identify corrupt and incompetent administrators or board members, and 
  • steadfastly refuse to produce ethically redacted public records of investigations of felony criminal misconduct in the leadership of the APS police force, and
  • their limitless spending on litigation to protect the leadership of the APS from the consequences of their misconduct; civil and criminal.  Spending that is "overseen" by underlings.  They claim subordinate oversight.  It is oxymoronic, and worse. And
  • that litigation is being done without the presentation of a "case analysis" before the whole board (for what reason except to maintain plausible deniability when the truth gets out.  Truth that won't leave a single senior APS administrator left standing, and
  • so is quite frankly, that the only guy standing up a public forum and calling them on their bullshit, has been banned for life (or until I admit to doing what I have not done, and promise to never do it again, despite my several First Amendment rights to do just that) from just the public forum at school board meetings, and only from there according to Defendant Marty Esquivel.
How many hundreds of thousands have they spent and need to hide?  Hell, how many millions?

So why won't the Journal, KRQE, KOAT, or KOB TV investigate and report upon the ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS?

Except that they are complacent, or
except that they are complicit?

photos Mark Bralley

No comments: