Local news outlets in Aiken County reveal that they received recommendations from the APS Board in support of Beth Everitt.
According to WJBF TV in South Carolina (link)
"Her entire board stated ..."
According to the Aiken Standard (link) "... she ... has gotten strong endorsements from ... the Albuquerque School Board president."
The APS school board is required by law to do yearly evaluations of the APS superintendent. They have not complied with the law.
Instead, they apparently wrote individual letters of recommendation; letters which I suppose cannot be gotten under the Inspection of Public Records Act, because they are covered by APS' "personnel protections."
If the board had done its required evaluation, it would have been subject to public scrutiny. Board members would have been held accountable for what they wrote.
They didn't, and they aren't.
This is the modus operandi of passing a lemon.
Again, according to the Aiken Standard, (link) Aiken School Board Chair Dr. Christine "Sanders indicated she was familiar with blogs in Albuquerque that criticized Everitt and compares them to unsigned "talkback" comments that shouldn't be legitimized.
Readers please note that Sanders did not, and can not
identify even a single "illegitimacy" on this blog.
She will come to regret her flippant disregard of a blog that has yet to be challenged on a single allegation or statement of fact in the previous one thousand four hundred and fiftysix posts.
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Aiken County hoodwinked by APS Board?
Posted by ched macquigg at 9:58 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Your name is in the html of your link. Your name is listed in your profile. How are any of your comments "unsigned"?
Some of your readers leave unsigned comments, but that is not the meat of your arguments nor the core of the values you set forth here. No "unsigned" allegations of any kind are portrayed here, as far as I can see.
I wonder if South Carolina Public record laws would allow Everrit's application packet to become released? That would include the recomendation letters. APS might not have to provide it, but SC might.
Let Sander's think whatever she wants about Beth. We know the truth about the march of the lemons, and in time, they will too!
Post a Comment