In the Journal this morning, link, someone wrote an exposé of circumstances you first read about here last Thursday; APS wants to "hire" one of their old good ole boys to investigate their current incompetence and corruption*.
*Whatever it is that is wrong with the leadership of the APS, flows from one or both of two wells;
- incompetence; misfeasance; people not knowing how to do their jobs, and or
- corruption; non or malfeasance, people choosing to not do their jobs.
The are only two kinds of circumstances leading to success or failure in any endeavor;
- circumstances beyond control, and
- circumstances within control.
If the standards of conduct and competence are high enough, and if people are held actually and honestly accountable to them, their endeavor will succeed. If the standards are too low, or if they are not really accountable to meaningful standards, the endeavor will fail. It is that simple.
That the leadership of the APS refuses even to talk about their ethics, standards and accountability is "proof" of problems with one or all three. Problems so bad, so embarrassing, shaming or indicting, that they need to keep them secret from stake and interest holders.
That the Journal is yet assign a competent reporter to investigate and report upon ethics, standards and accountability in the leadership of the APS is I believe, "proof" that Kent Walz and the Journal are part of the cover up of the ethics, standards and accountability crisis in the leadership of the APS.
photo Mark Bralley