Journal readers to remain ignorant of APS audit woes

KRQE has done the right thing.  Their viewers not only know about problems with APS audit findings; link, but about additional issues, link.  KOAT offered a modicum of attention, link.  KOB offered its viewers no coverage at all.

Journal readers too, have read jack.

I suspect it isn't the reporter assigned to cover APS, who doesn't want to investigate and report upon standards and accountability issues in the leadership of the APS, it's his boss Journal Managing Editor Kent Walz.

I will bow as always to controverting truth.




photo ched macquigg

Teachers being surveyed!

Some news from this morning's Journal editorial, link, here quoted in significant part;

"Teachers, ... have a say about education today."

Were it true, it would be truly remarkable.

It would represent a diametric reversal in the fundamental paradigm.  As I have oft mentioned, in the APS alone, teachers have nearly 100,000 years of teaching experience and no "say" at all.  Teachers have no seat at the table where decisions are made about education.

A lot depends on the survey instrument itself.   If they have asked the right questions,

 “The results of the statewide survey will inform how we can best prepare classroom teachers and school leaders.”

If the right questions weren't asked, the survey will have been pointless.

So far the survey, link, is apparently unavailable to non-participants.
Update: the survey is available; link, I didn't search far enough. It appears the right questions have been asked.

It would seem that the roll out of the survey has been bungled (teachers don't know about it).  The return rate is only around 1 in 20.  They were hoping for a return rate of 1 in 2. The fewer teachers who respond, the less valid the results. 

With regard to the word "not getting out"; the survey began more than two weeks ago and the word came out on APS' award winning website 13 hours ago, link.

The editors wrote;

"... the information gleaned will be available and important to all of New Mexico’s education policy leaders."

... but not to any interest holder, not to every interest holder?

I can't help but wonder if the survey results are going to be as hard to find as the survey.
Update; the survey was available, I failed to find it.

Will the results be redacted in the interests of powerful people trying to protect the corrupt, the incompetent, and those with guilty knowledge of incompetence and corruption?  Will any findings that name names, be hidden?

It wouldn't be the first time.  Not by a long shot.

The editors aver;

As the Legislature considers reforms this session, teachers have an opportunity to make their voices heard in another meaningful way.

If it's so meaningful, why is it not newsworthy? Why haven't the editors assigned a reporter to investigate and report on the survey?

The editors called out teachers,

Let New Mexico know what you think about education and what can be done to improve it.

Journal readers have a right to call out the editors.

Let New Mexico know what teachers think.  Let New Mexico know what teachers think of the survey; was it any good?  Did they ask the right questions?

What about the teachers who chose to not participate? Why didn't they?

The Journal's record is of reporting the administrative and executive perspective on education while steadfastly ignoring input from people who work in classrooms; people who work everyday at the educational interface, where the system and students meet face to face.

And for the record, my invitation to meet with the new Journal education reporter, link, was apparently ignored.

I say "apparently" because it is impossible to distinguish a difference between being ignored, being stonewalled or any one of a number of perfectly good reasons he hasn't responded; maybe he's on vacation or ill, maybe the email got lost in the ether.

Or maybe he was told to not respond.

Maybe it was his own deliberate decision.

The net result is the same, any answer except yes, including no answer at all, means no.



photo Mark Bralley

APS spending millions without oversight

The leadership of the APS gets sued a lot; both individually and collectively. They spend millions of dollars annually on their defense.  They spend so much money on litigation, compared to comparable districts, that their insurer, United Educators, raised our premiums to cover their losses.  The premium payments come from operational funds; tax dollars would otherwise be spent in classrooms.

Some of the complaints against them are unwarranted.

Many more of the complaints are legitimate complaints of administrative and executive incompetence and or corruption. Rather than own up to the consequences of their incompetence and corruption, the standard to which they hold students accountable, the leadership of the APS will instead use an unlimited budget to pay teams of lawyers to litigate their exception to the law; the lowest standards of conduct there are; the standards that every higher standard is higher than.

The litigation is conducted in the interests of senior administrators, board members and the district, and against the public interests.

The only thing that might keep senior administrators and board members from spending tax dollars in the own interests is oversight.  Oversight in this case is by underling; APS Director of Risk Management Mike Wilson, himself subordinate to them all. The appearance of a conflict of interests is created when subordinates are asked to make decisions that affect the interests of their superordinates.

As far as public oversight over the administration of public resources, it is supposed to be provided by the school board.  It is not.  The board is supposed oversee litigation by listening to candid, forthright and honest "case analyses" presented by their lawyers.  If the lawyer's analysis is that the administrators and or board members are guilty as sin, should settle and decide instead to delay the inevitable through protracted and unjustifiably expensive litigation; the board is supposed to say hell no.  Instead, they have decided to enjoy the plausible deniability that accompanies "knowing nothing".

If at the end of protracted litigation, it looks like they're going to lose, APS and their lawyers will "settle".  Settle means; pay complainants enough money to get them to drop their complaints and sign an agreement that allows the guilty to exonerate themselves of all allegations.  The agreement will read; the respondents admit to no wrong doing.   As further cover over the underlying incompetence or corruption, the local media will then report that the settlement was only made in order to avoid more expensive litigation during which their innocence would have been established.

No administrator or board member is ever held individually accountable for their misconduct and the consequent cost to taxpayers.

That's wrong, right?

The establishment media's relentless refusal to investigate and report upon the spending of millions of operational dollars under conflicted or non-existent oversight is wrong, right?




photo Mark Bralley

Journal has a new education reporter; for all the good it will do

A link to Journal Staff Writer Jon Swedien's recent reports or the Journal, will lead you to a number of recent reports on the APS and a foundation for the supposition that APS is now his beat.

It is fair to say, there is not a critical one among them.

And that is problematic for Journal reading APS interest holders. It is problematic for voters and their efforts to hold School Board Members accountable for holding the Superintendent accountable.

The leadership of the APS would like to be held accountable only for their latest greatest acts.  Their incompetence and corruption, not so much.

For a "newspaper of record", wikilink, to aid and abet the leadership of the APS in a deliberate manipulation of the truth in their own interests is at the very least "journalistic malpractice".  Try holding them accountable for that.  In what venue can it be alleged that the Journal is engaged in ongoing Journalistic malpractice, and where that complaint will see enjoy due process?

Should the Journal report on the good things happening in the APS?  Of course they should; it's newsworthy.  But the truth about their earned success is no more newsworthy than the honest truth about their earned failures.

The earned success at Rio Grande and Highland High Schools, link, is no more newsworthy than the coverup of  senior APS administrative involvement in felony criminal misconduct, link, wanton criminal abuse of a federal criminal database, and the misappropriation of funds.

The earned success in musical education, link, is newsworthy, but no more newsworthy than the fact that the only agency of law enforcement that investigated felony criminal misconduct involving senior APS administrators was APS' own Praetorian Guard; a publicly funded private police force that reports directly to, and only to, the leadership of the APS.  No more newsworthy than that, the findings of their self investigations were never turned over to the DA for prosecution.

I would like to point out that don't hold reporters like Swedien personally responsible for the Journal's malpractice, anymore than I hold the broadcast media "investigative" teams responsible for the orders they aren't given by their news directors.

I hold management accountable.

I hold people like Journal editor Kent Walz personally accountable for the failure to investigate and report upon credible allegations and evidence of a standards and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS.

And so should you.




photo Mark Bralley
Walz photo ched macquigg
 

cc Swedien upon posting; including an offer to meet anytime, anywhere, should he be so inclined.

What if somebody threw a march, and nobody showed up?

Mark Bralley and I went over to Wilson Middle School to document a "march" around the campus.

We found a familiar picture; a small group of parents and community members who are frustrated with what they perceive to be administrative indifference to their important concerns.

A meeting was held, I am told, and as many as 79 people indicated they would show up and march.

Very few of them actually showed up.



Granted, it was a crappy day;
cold and windy.  But still.

My dad talked to me often about the need for people who are willing to be the first to step into the breach.

More important than the people willing to be the first into the breach, are those willing to be the second and the third and the fourth ...  Otherwise there's no point in anyone stepping in.

The fundamental problem escaped media attention.

The impression of administrative indifference flows from the relentless refusal of the leadership of the APS to engage in honest to God two-way communication.  Their relentless refusal to point to a time, a day, and a place where they will simply answer questions candidly, forthrightly and honestly?

Is (the perception of) APS administrative indifference just that, or is it real?

If it is only indifference to the people, that would be bad enough.

Indifference is the essence of inhumanity.  George Bernard Shaw 

What if they are simply hiding inconvenient truth?
What if they are covering up administrative incompetence and corruption?




photos Mark Bralley

Parents and community members on the march

Channel 7 reported at around 9 this morning;

Happening Today

Dozens of people will march (at Wilson Middle School) Thursday, starting at noon, asking for change. The protest will begin at Wilson Park and go up and down San Pedro and then around Wilson Middle School. (The hope is that) community members will attend and pay attention to realize how bad things are getting.

They and other folks who believe the leadership of the APS isn't paying enough attention to problems in their schools and neighborhoods are looking for support.

Perhaps if it had been reported under Happening Tomorrow,
KOAT's effort to inform the democracy would have enabled more parents and community members to show up and march. But at least they are reporting that there are a number of parents and community members who believe the leadership of the APS isn't paying enough attention to problems in their schools and neighborhoods.

Government of, by and for the people includes a seat at the table where decisions are made about wielding the people's power and spending their resources. A table where honest to God two-way communication takes place between the leadership of the APS and the community members they serve.

Character education in public schools

A reader posted a comment, link, suggesting that I inform myself about what it is I'm trying to defend.  Actually, based upon my background and experience I consider myself pretty well informed on this issue.  Nevertheless, I followed their link to the Wikipedia, link, just to make sure.

There are some problems, they aren't new.  One issue is over what to teach; what is ethical, what is moral?

There is no consensus on which terms to use, or even how many pillars or principles to address and that is problematic.

According to the Wikipedia, salvation comes from Aristotle;

The key to finding this balance is to enjoy and recognize the value of developing one’s rational powers, and then using this recognition to determine which actions are appropriate in which circumstances.

Developing rational powers and using them to determine what is ethical or moral under the circumstances, requires a certain amount of learning and thinking about ethics and morals.

At the very least, character education requires a common vocabulary and mutually understood tenets.  It requires teaching, learning and practicing.  None of which will happen if we give up entirely on efforts to provide character education in public schools.

• The formation of character in young people is educationally a different task from and a prior task to, the discussion of the great, difficult ethical controversies of the day. - William J. Bennett, author and former U.S. Secretary of Education (b. 1943)

• If we want our children to possess the traits of character we most admire, we need to teach them what those traits are and why they deserve both admiration and allegiance. Children must learn to identify the forms and content of those traits.- William J. Bennett

• To educate a person in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society. - Theodore Roosevelt, American adventurer and president (1858-1919)

Grad rate increase > 40% over three years - too good to be true?

APS Executive Director of Communications Monica Armenta reports, link;

APS saw gains in the graduation rate in every demographic sub group, but the biggest gains came from those students with disabilities. The graduation rate for that group increased more than 40% in three years!

The increase is from 44.9% in 2011 to more than 63% in 2013. That rate jumped 14 percentage points in just one year. This is remarkable. Really.

Really?

40% growth in graduation rates over three years is indeed remarkable.  The growth can flow from either or both of two springs; lower standards or increased performance.

If standards were lowered to increase graduation rates, student interests were not served.  The Community was not served.  Only the interests of those who need higher gradation rates to keep their jobs, were served.

It's not the graduation certificate that gets you through the rest of your life, it's the knowledge and skill set that the graduation certificate is supposed to represent.  Making the certificate meaningless in order to give more of them out is utterly indefensible.

On the other hand, if knowledge and skill set have actually grown more than 40%, it represents a near doubling of successful efforts to educate.  Again, "remarkable";

worthy of being or likely to be noticed especially as being uncommon or extraordinary

Worthy of coverage in journals of education.

Worthy of coverage in the Albuquerque Journal.

If a number of APS teachers, staff and students are experiencing unheard of success, it is newsworthy. Where is the investigation and report?

Journal Editor Kent Walz

It's time for the Journal to step up to their obligation to inform the democracy about the public interests in the public schools.

Enough is enough.




photo Mark Bralley
Walz; ched macquigg 

APS Board reining in Kathy Korte?

If nothing else, APS School Board Vice President Kathy Korte is volatile and vociferous.

Korte seconds after attacking photo journalist Mark Bralley

Korte, feeling stalked and intimidated by Mark Bralley

Korte's v and v are creating problems for the Board.  Korte is known to show up in places and advocate on behalf of issues, not all of which necessarily enjoy the mutual support of the rest of the board.

When Korte speaks outside board meetings and speaks as "APS School Board Vice President Kathy Korte", a perception is created that Korte speaks for the board.

No problem if they and Korte are in tune.  It becomes a problem if and when she wanders off the reservation. APS School Board Policy makes it very clear; school board members have zero authority except when acting as a board.

Exceptions are made.

The most notable of which is the fact that APS police officers, the board's Praetorian Guard, freely admit that they take orders from board members despite their lack of authority to give them. 

They freely admit they will eject someone from a public meeting; someone who has broken no law, no rule, no regulation, and at the absolute whim of a board member, link.

According their agenda, link, the APS School Board will discuss "Clarification of Board Member Advocacy".  The agenda indicates no action to be taken.

APS board meeting agendas typically lack "reasonable specificity", a phrase that comes up in the New Mexico Open Meetings Act.

Their agendas lack specificity because if more people knew what they were doing, more people would show up to watch them do it.

How would you know from

C. Clarification of Board Member Advocacy (Discussion)
Presenter: Albuquerque Public Schools Board of Education

whether you needed to be there or not?

Board meeting attendance is routinely, abysmally low.

The leadership of the APS like it that way.

Attendance is low because nobody cares, because nobody knows what's really going on.

Nobody knows what's going on because the establishment's press has let down the people.  They have failed to fully inform the democracy.

The Journal aids and abets in their steadfast refusal to investigate anything in APS.

Sure, they cover a scandal every once in awhile, link, when they haven't a choice.  Mostly they publish what the PR wing of the APS would like them to.

Where is the Journal coverage of the cover up of that scandal?

Doesn't the democracy need to know about the cover up even more than they needed to know about the scandal?  Isn't the cover up more newsworthy now, than the scandal was then?

Why hasn't Managing Editor Kent Walz told readers that nobody ever investigated felony criminal misconduct involving APS senior administrators except APS' own investigators or investigators in their employ?

Why hasn't Walz told readers that evidence of felony criminal misconduct was never turned over to the DA for prosecution?

Why hasn't Walz told interest holders that even after statutes of limitation on felony criminal misconduct have expired, all of the findings of all of the investigations are still being hidden from public knowledge by the leadership of the APS and their lawyers, in blatant violation of the New Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act?

Why hasn't the Journal investigated and reported upon the cover up, except that they are part of the cover up?

Why are KRQE, KOAT, and KOB TV's so call community serving investigative teams not picking at this scab?

Except that they are at the management level;, at the former APS School Board heavy hitter Paula Maes' NM Broadcasters Association Affiliate level, are part of the cover up.




photos Mark Bralley and Korte's own facebook.

Do graduation rates and SAT scores correlate? Should they?

The leadership of the APS would have interest holders believe that graduation rates in the APS are improving and further, that the improvement is the product of their leadership.

At about the time students complete high school, in particular if they intend attend college, they take the SAT, ACT or both.  They are nationally normed cumulative tests.  The most recent data I found on APS' award winning website, link, shows little growth over roughly the same period they claim significant growth in graduation rates.

It seems discordant that measures of learning and proficiency like the SAT and ACT do not correlate more directly with graduation rates.  Are the tests not fair measures of the success a school district is having.  There are some problems with looking a longitudinal test results on standardized tests because the results are re-normed too frequently to compare long term, but they are still meaningful measure of short term growth or decline.

This discordance is relevant because growth in standardized test scores and graduation rates are both considered to be indicators of success.  APS claims considerable growth in graduation rates (as much growth as from 50 to 73% graduation rate in last several years) at the same time SAT and ACT scores remained considerably more static.  The ACT average for APS was in the very low 20s out of 36 possible.  The average SAT score for APS appears to be mid 1500's out of 1800 possible.

The disparity stems from an ability to manipulate graduation rates more easily than SAT and ACT scores.  A good part of the increase in APS graduation rates flowed from changes in the way the graduation rate was calculated, not necessarily because APS was doing a better job of educating students.  The changes; going from a four year plan to a five year plan, and dropping students who fail the 9th grade out of their cohort, raised graduation rates independently of educational growth.

Why are the most current results two years old?

Why aren't there more current data to consider?

In my experience with the APS, the truth is hard to find if it can be used to substantiate allegations of incompetence or corruption in the leadership of the APS.

The ban on truth seeking is enforced by a publicly funded private police force accountable only to the leadership of the APS. 

APS doesn't talk about the SAT and ACT because they are static and cast real doubt on their claims of dynamic growth in performance.




photo Mark Bralley

Brooks will hold public meeting on discipline

The meeting is critically important because student discipline in the APS is in decline and has been for some time.

Were the situation not in decline, we would have heard as much from APS Executive Director of Communication Monica Armenta.

There would be hoopla and press conferences to tout the improvement.

There would be a page in her calendar dedicated to better behaving students.

Were the situation good, there would be corroborating records and empirical data supporting the claim.

Were the situation good, the Journal editors would be singing high praise for their good friends in the leadership of the APS and their success.

No news means bad news.

Coincidental with the decline in student discipline is the utter abandonment of character education in the APS.

The decline is fact;
the abandonment is fact;
only the correlation remains unexplored.

APS Supt Winston Brooks will hold a public meeting at which he will offer a data rich presentation on student discipline in the APS.

He will cover the history of problems in APS. 

He will explain current efforts to maintain adult authority in classrooms and schools. 

He will present APS' plans for the future, for addressing the issues of student misconduct and chronically disruptive students.

He will take questions from interest holders.

Unfortunately the media will not be able to cover the meeting.

They will be otherwise occupied, reporting on a number of more remarkable events that will happen earlier in the day;

• pigs will fly,
• fish will speak,
• rocks won't sink,
• snakes will smoke,
• frogs will grow hair,
• hell will freeze over,
• chickens will grow teeth,
• fish will climb poplar trees,
• grapes will grow on willows,
• the sun will rise in the west,
• white crows will fly upside down,
• crayfish will whistle on the mountain,
• and, monkeys will fly out of my ass.

Adynatons; wikilink




photos Mark Bralley

Does education in the APS include character education? Should it?

Whether you agree that character education, a deliberate and concerted effort to enable children to grow into adults who embrace character and courage and honor, is or should be part of public education is an important question.

It is far too important a question to remain unasked.

In 1994, the APS Board of Education passed a resolution adopting character education in the APS.  The resolution has never been rescinded; it is as binding today as it was the night they passed it unanimously.

Please read the resolution.  Read it carefully.  Point to anything that is not as true today as it was in 1994.

Resolution

To endorse and Implement Character Counts! Program in the Albuquerque Public Schools

Whereas, Albuquerque Public Schools reaffirms the need to join with other community groups to actively engage in the development and demonstration of ethical behavior among youth, adults, and

Whereas, the mission of Albuquerque Public Schools is to provide learners of all ages the skills and knowledge needed to become successful and productive members of a dynamic society, and

Whereas, the Albuquerque Public Schools recognizes that students in our schools are more likely now than in the past to experience family disintegration, homicide, drug use, teen age pregnancy, dishonesty, suicide, and strong messages from media and society that undermine home teaching of ethical values, and

Whereas, the Albuquerque Public Schools recognizes that no single community institution can instill ethical behavior in youth and adults if it is acting without the support of other institutions and groups, and

Whereas, the Albuquerque Public Schools recognizes the important role played by teachers and other adults in school settings in modeling good character for young people

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED;

1. That the Albuquerque Public Schools endorses the Aspen Declaration on Character Education, link, as well as the Character Counts! Program as ways to develop character based on six core ethical values; trustworthiness, respect, responsibility , fairness, caring and citizenship;

2. That the Albuquerque Public Schools will enter into community-wide discussions with other institutions and groups to reach agreements about the role of each in promoting ethical behavior among young people, and adults in various aspects of life;

3. That the Albuquerque Public Schools is committed to creating models of ethical behavior among all adults who serve students and schools;

4. That the core curriculum should continue to give explicit attention to character development as an ongoing art of school instruction; (emphasis added)


5. That materials, teaching methods, partnerships, and services to support school programs shall be selected, in part, for their capacity to support the development of character among youth and adults;

6. That all schools examine school curriculum and practices to identify and extend opportunities for developing character, especially through the utilization of violence-prevention programs, mediation training, community service programs. fair rules which are fairy enforced, democratic practices in classrooms and organizations, and extracurricular activities which help students learn and model caring and ethical behavior.

DATED this 2nd day of March, 1994

Should the leadership of the APS be allowed to simply turn their backs on this resolution?  Should the senior-most role models in the entire APS be allowed to simply abdicate without saying a word?

Before role models can expect students to hold themselves accountable to higher standards of conduct than their own, shouldn't they have to explain to them, in words any child can understand,

why students are expected to model (honest accountability to) and promote the Pillars of Character Counts!, link, and school board members and the superintendent are not.

The school board and senior administration employ a publicly funded private police force, a Praetorian Guard if ever there were, to use their uniforms and badges and guns to prevent me from standing at the podium during public forum and insisting that they defend their abandonment of their obligation to model and promote honest accountability to higher standards of conduct than the law.

They wouldn't be able to get away with this without the aid and abet of Kent Walz' Journal in a coverup of an ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS.

The Journal and Paula Maes' NM Broadcasters Association affiliates; KRQE, KOAT, and KOB are willfully ignoring credible evidence of a standards and accountability crisis of high order.

Perhaps if you and enough others ask them to, the editors and news directors in the establishment media, will investigate and report upon APS administrative and executive standards and accountability; whether the standards and accountability in APS are adequate to protect the public interests in the public schools.

The press has a responsibility to inform the democracy,  They have an obligation to provide a candid, forthright and honest accounting of the standards and accountability in government.

Are the standards high enough?  Is the accountability swift and certain enough?

Are APS school board members and senior administrators honestly accountable to meaningful standards of conduct and competence?

They are not and somebody needs to do something.

When people say "somebody should do something", mostly they mean somebody else needs do something.

And nothing gets done.


You have an opportunity to defend character education in the APS. Insist that the Journal link, KRQE link, KOAT link, and KOB link investigate and report upon the state of character education in the APS. Insist upon being told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Or you could hope that enough other people do.

I'm not saying these people are evil, but when Edmund Burke wrote;

the only thing necessary for evil to prevail in the world
is for good men to do nothing

this is the evil he was writing about. You are who he was writing to.

Sacrifice is the currency of commitment.  If one is not willing to make a sacrifice in defense of a principle, the must wonder what is their commitment to the principle in the first place.  What is our commitment to the ethical development of students in the APS?

What sacrifices are the leadership of the APS willing to make to grow students in to adults who embrace character and courage and honor.  Are they willing to show them what it looks like?  They are not and it is up to you to hold them accountable.

One of your trusted news outlets will be the first to tell you the truth about the ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS, all the rest of them will be among the last.

High school graduation rates; incremental growth is unsustainable.

The public schools are engaged in an endeavor at which are about 70% successful.  Seven out of 10 children who enroll in a public high school leave with a diploma.

Never mind that the many of them can't read.

Never mind that most of them will require remedial education before they can begin college.

Never mind that most of them haven't a skill set that will help them find a good job.

Improvement in any endeavor can be incremental or cataclysmic.

The growth we are seeing in public school education is incremental.  Basically, we picking a few leftover low hanging fruit. There is only so much low hanging fruit.  There are not enough low hanging fruit to continue to get better by two percent every for the next twelve years.  There are children in kindergarten today, who will drop out of school before incremental reform would be complete even if it were possible.  It isn't possible.

There is no magic.  Nothing can remedy the fundamentally flawed group learn model for public school education.  It cannot be redeemed.

The only hope for public education and 30% of students is cataclysmic change.

A cataclysmic change by definition could raise graduation rates overnight.

Perish the thought, but if all the schools burned down and all the teachers disappeared, how long do you think it would take for people to figure out that they can learn pretty much everything they
will ever need to know, sitting at a computer connected to the "internet"?

The modern mission of public school education is to create independent lifelong learners.  The primary objective is to create independent lifelong learners at the earliest opportunity.

When learning becomes independent, we can insist upon mastery level learning.  Students will master material and move to the next at their own speed and with the fundamentals they need to master it as well.

When students learn how to learn independently, teachers will no longer be charged with making 30 individuals learn in unison.

Trust me, it will free up a lot of their time.  It will give teachers real time to pay attention to individual students and their individual needs.

Graduation rates will skyrocket, overnight.




photo Mark Bralley

APS lawyers' ethical misconduct; you be the judge.

For the purposes of this post, ethical means ethical as it is conceptualized APS student standards of conduct; the Pillars of Character Counts!; a nationally recognized, accepted and respected code of ethical conduct and decision making.  Because the Pillars are the standards of conduct for students, they are the standards of conduct for their senior-most role models; the senior administration and school board.

The "leadership" of the APS cannot pretend to be accountable to high standards as role models and claim then different, lower standards as defendants in legal proceedings.  If they think it's OK, then they need to explain exactly why it is OK, and in words any child can understand.

Bralley by Mary Ellen Broadrick

APS is being sued by Mark Bralley.  Bralley is a photojournalist and blogger.

He is suing APS over their several violations of his civil rights as a citizen and as a member of the press.

The Journal is yet to cover the story.

Journal Managing Editor Kent Walz and the Journal have yet to acknowledge the litigation.  Co-incidentally, that litigation is not going to go well for the leadership of the APS nor for students, teachers and taxpayers.

The Journal, as a newspaper of record, has an obligation to inform the democracy when their power and resources are at stake.  The Journal knows the drill; they covered the filing of my complaints, link, albeit lacking candor, forthrightness and honesty.

Bralley is litigating pro se.  The rules of court procedure recognize that pro se litigants have little or no experience suing powerful people and their lawyers.  The rules discourage lawyers from using the rules against the interests of justice.

Nevertheless, they are.  APS lawyers are trying to use the rules to obfuscate Bralley's efforts to hold their clients accountable for their incompetence and corruption.  They claim summons were not properly served, and therefore Bralley's several complaints should be dismissed.  They claim the summons were served on the wrong person.

The truth is, Bralley made a considerable effort to determine the identity of the person(s) who were authorized to accept service.  At every opportunity, APS lawyers Art Melendres, Luis Robles, and Pat Allen had an ethical, and it can be argued - a legal obligation, to answer his questions candidly, forthrightly and honestly.  They could have when asked, simply told him the name of the person(s) who could accept service. They did not.

Melendres is APS' Chief Counsel.
He and his firm, the Modrall, have been making a killing off APS and taxpayers for decades.

They make so much money litigating on behalf of APS, that Melendres in sworn deposition, could not recollect within a hundred thousand dollars, how much.

He finally settled on a figure somewhere north of a $1.25M annually.


Defendant Marty Esquivel gets his own lawyer Luis Robles, link.

When Robles was presented with Bralley's Complaint, the subject of its extraordinary length came up.  Robles expressed his glee, indicating its length simply meant that many "more billable hours".

Billed at what rate, and under the oversight of whom exactly, still to be determined.

Only Esquivel gets his own lawyer, the rest of the defendants share the counsel of one lawyer. one Pat Allen, link..

It is unclear how much money has been spent, or even if they are working on signed contracts, link.

The leadership of the APS, the school board and senior leadership teams are litigating, literally, to save their individual and collective ass.

It is their combined intention that they will not be held accountable for their conduct and competence, to any standards higher than the law.

Is it legal?  They will argue that it is.

In the meantime, they tell students that their character is forfeit should they be unwilling to do more than the law requires and less than the law allows.

They are spending hundreds of thousands of operational dollars to pay lawyers to create cost is no object defenses against legitimate complaints, and to except them from honest accountability to any higher standard of conduct than the law.  In fact, their record is one of a lack of accountability even to the law.

The law is the lowest standard of conduct.  It is the standard that every higher standard, is higher than.  Higher standards means higher standards than the law.

So who says the leadership of the APS is accountable to higher standards of conduct?

The leadership of the APS donned that mantel when they decided to establish and enforce higher standards of conduct on students.

Students are expected, according to school board policy as expressed in the APS Student Behavior Handbook, link, to hold themselves accountable to higher standards of conduct;

students are expected to model and promote the Pillars of Character Counts! Trustworthiness, Respect, Responsibility, Fairness, Caring, and Citizenship.

Unless you accept their manifest position that senior-leaders in the APS have no real obligations as role models of student standards of conduct; they are accountable to higher standards of conduct than the law.  They are required to behave and litigate ethically.

Evidence will show that Bralley made an earnest effort to serve process and that, that effort was obfuscated unethically and as a judge will determine, illegally.  Link to Bralley's Complaint, Motions to dismiss, objections and affidavits.

Did APS lawyers hamper Plaintiff Bralley by misdirection and by failure to respond, thereby avoiding service?

Did they actively or passively obstruct service by resorting to willful perjury, subornation of perjury and conspiracy?

These are important questions.  If the people are to hold school board members accountable at election, for the conduct and competence of the administration the board oversees, the people have a need; moreover they have a right to the truth about the conduct and competence of senior administrators; public servants whose salaries they pay.

The establishment's media has turned their collective back on their obligation to fully inform the democracy.  Whether complicit or complacent in the cover up of a standards and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS, they have betrayed the trust placed in them by this community.

Are APS administrative and executive standards of conduct and competence adequate?  Is there honest accountability to meaningful standards of conduct and competence?

Whether there are high enough standards and swift and certain accountability is newsworthy.

• It is newsworthy if there are adequate standards and accountability to protect the public interests.
• It is more newsworthy if there are not.

Either way, it's newsworthy.




photos Mark Bralley

Journal sees smaller classes as the answer - misses the point

If there were a way to precisely measure the outcome of educational interventions, one could calculate cost effectiveness of each.  One might find that lowering class size by some percentage will raise test scores by some correlating percentage and, then employ interventions or not based on their cost effectiveness.

Lowering class size is very expensive and according to research, a largely ineffective intervention until class sizes are nearly halved.

Textbooks are very expensive and manifestly ineffective.  They are particularly ineffective for students who can't read.  And by "can't read" it is important to understand that in this context, can't read means can't read well.  Mediocre readers, the overwhelming majority of students, are not well served by textbooks.

Ask a teacher, ask if they would rather have a different primary learning resource.  Textbooks are most useful and most used as a teaching tool when a teacher's immediate need is to keep 30 squirming minds and bodies under control.  Textbooks are employed in unison, every student opens to the same page at the same moment.  Faster readers grow bored, slower readers fall still further behind.

The Journal editors this morning, expressed opinion on the effectiveness of smaller classes.

I would be willing to bet a modest sum, that their opinion is not expert.  I would bet not one of them has taken advantage of the opportunity to substitute teach for a day.  I would be willing to bet a similar sum that not one Journal reporter, nor any investigative reporter for any TV or radio station, has substitute taught for a day.

There is no evidence to suggest that the establishment media has made any effort at all to find out what teachers think about what's going on in classrooms and schools.  There have been no surveys, no interviews, no investigations.  Do they really want smaller classes or might they want something else instead?

Maybe they would rather have larger classes and more control.

Doesn't it seem odd to anyone at all, that there has never been an investigation and report on discipline in schools?  I represent that it is a significant problem.  In some classrooms and schools, it is the number one problem.  And yet, the truth remains hidden.

Why hide the truth about discipline in schools?

It is because the responsibility for establishing and enforcing discipline policies does not rest on teachers.  It rests squarely on the shoulders of school board members and administrators and they have the power and influence necessary to hide the truth about their failure.

To admit failure to establish and enforce meaningful standards of conduct is to admit to executive and administrative incompetence.  And to the extent that guilty knowledge is malfeasance, failure to remedy administrative incompetence is corrupt.  The executive and administrative failure to keep schools under control is manifest incompetence and corruption.

And that is why we never talk about student discipline and the effects of chronically disruptive students in APS classrooms and hallways.

It is fair to wonder how the establishment media remains disengaged.  It might be complicity - maybe the leadership of the APS asked them to help with the cover up and they obliged.

Maybe it is complacency, maybe they just don't care.
If so, they should worry it might be true that;

The hottest places in hell are reserved for those
who, in times of great moral crisis, are complacent.

unk derived

Teachers, should they have authority over students?

Should a teacher have a right and responsibility to tell a student to

Stop doing that.

and should the student be expected to comply?

If a teacher, or any other adult at school tells a child to stop doing that and the child's response means no, something must be done.

The permission of prohibited behavior is categorically unacceptable; in particular as a matter of practice.  It sends exactly the wrong message.  It undermines authority.

What is the point of rules if no one has to obey them?

It is not up to a classroom teacher to address the issues that lead a student to conclude that they are in charge.  It is particularly not alright for a teacher's attention to be drawn from students who need it for more productive ends.

The establishment and enforcement of discipline polices is an executive (the school board) and administrative responsibility.  The inability or unwillingness to create and enforce standards of conduct that protect the interests of all stakeholders, is an executive and administrative failure.

For which they could be held accountable by the media, but will not.

Student discipline is newsworthy by any standard; either the truth makes the leadership of the APS look capable or it makes them look incompetent and corrupt.

Either they're on top of  the ball and deserve recognition, or they are behind the ball and must be held honestly accountable.

Either way, its news.




photo Mark Bralley

More able students - time to set them free?

In every public school classroom there are more able, less able and ordinarily able students.

For as long as more able students have been in public school classrooms, they have been held back in their education while less and ordinarily able students were taught and retaught the same material.

For as long as less able students have been in public school classrooms, they have fallen further and further and further behind until they drop out.

There is no reason why students cannot acquire education at their own individual speed.  There is no reason a student cannot be expected to master material, however long that takes, before moving to the next.

Even if you could take 30 kids with nothing in common but their age and then form them into thought choirs who can learn in unison, why would you want to?

What purpose would does serve?

If the goal of public school education is to create independent lifelong learners, why is it not the immediate objective?

Forget about class size

Imagine that a teacher is given a choice.  There are two classrooms and s/he can choose which s/he would like to teach. 

All else is equal except that

• one class is of 30 students all of whom are reasonably well behaved, and 
• the other class is of 28 students at least one of whom is chronically disruptive.

Which class do you think the teacher would choose?

Unless s/he is a glutton for punishment, s/he will opt to teach 30 kids, rather than choose to spend their dwindling energy and resources trying to keep fewer kids under control because of the influence of as few as one out of control student.

Reducing class size is by far, the most expensive and least effective way to establish and maintain control in classrooms and schools.  Teachers, if they were asked, would rather have real control over their classrooms and schools, than fewer students.

Yet the discourse is not about reestablishing control in schools, it is about lowering class size.

The issue is one of control, pure and simple.  A classroom is either under the control of, or out of the control of the adults in the room.  One is an educationally efficient environment and the other is not.  It makes a difference.

Who is really "in charge" in classrooms and schools, adults or students?

I submit;

If adults establish rules and students deliberately break them, then students are "in charge".

Take for example; students in charge in APS schools.

It is actually APS School Board Policy that students are prohibited from "sagging". Go to any APS school;

• If there are students sagging, saggers are in charge at that school.  
• If students are smoking in prohibited spaces, smokers are in charge at that school.  
• If students at that school can tell you the names of bullies at that school, the bullies are in charge at that school.

This isn't about "sagging", or smoking or bullying.  

It is about students defiantly engaging in prohibited behavior. 
It is about students being "in charge" in classrooms and schools and the consequent negative effects that creates.

Those whose job it has been to establish and maintain the authority of adults in schools would rather talk about class size than their failure to get classrooms and schools under control.

Arguing about reducing class size draws attention away from problems that could be solved if any real attention was paid to them.  Problems like restoring order in classrooms and schools.

Why is student discipline never discussed?

Where are the historical data, current statistics and future plans?  Where is the truth about student discipline in APS?

There is only one reason to hide the truth, and that is
to escape the consequences of so doing.

The leadership of the APS cannot show you a record of establishing control in schools, or there would not now be, out of control schools.

The leadership of the APS cannot show any empirical data that demonstrates that they are in currently in control in schools.  And most importantly, they cannot show you their plan for regaining and maintaining control in schools in the future.

The establishment and enforcement of discipline policies is an administrative and executive responsibility.

The out of control in schools and classrooms is manifest administrative and executive failure.

That's why the leadership of the APS is hiding the truth about student discipline problems in the APS.

Far more sinister; that the establishment's media is helping them hide the truth about the effects of out of control students on the education of all students.

Why won't they investigate and report upon student discipline in the APS from teachers' perspective?  Why won't they publish the truth?

Ask them.




photo Mark Bralley

APS transparency; an illustrative example of abject insufficiency

The leadership of the APS and their cronies in the establishment media would like stakeholders to believe that the administration of their trust and treasure by the leadership of the APS is transparent.  It is not.

The most current example; the meeting tomorrow of the Audit Committee, link, and their discussion of Ethical Advocate statistics.

Ethical Advocate is a whistle blower program.  It is the only venue where an employee or community member can file a complaint of administrative or executive incompetence or corruption, and be protected from retaliation over the complaint.  Supposedly; in practice the promised anonymity for the complainant is only temporary.

The Ethical Advocate statistics, link, will be presented by APS Director of Internal Audits Peg Koshmider.

The only information she and the leadership of the APS are prepared to produce is the number of complaints filed by month and year, and the number of complaints that have been "closed".

A "closed" complaint is a complaint filed against an administrator that is then adjudicated by another administrator.  An appearance of a conflict of interests is created when administrators investigate each other.

At one time, the school board addressed the conflict of interests by promising to review and approve the administrative self investigation of every single complaint.  When called on the commitment, they changed school board policy and abandoned their executive oversight over administrative self investigation.

In any event, there is a missing statistic.  How many Ethical Advocate complaints against administrators are settled to the satisfaction of the complainant?  How many complainants think their complaint was denied due process?

I have filed three complaints under Ethical Advocate and its predecessor Silent Whistle.

I complained that APS Supt Winston Brooks had abandoned his responsibilities as the senior-most administrative role model of student standards of conduct.

Later, I complained that, that complaint had been "closed" without due process.

And finally, I complained that APS Chief Operations Officer Brad Winter had promised to produce a candid, forthright and honest accounting of spending at 6400 Uptown Blvd. and did not.

All three of the complaints were "closed" though Brooks is still not accountable as a role model of student standards of conduct, and Winter has still has not told the truth about the millions and millions of dollars they have spent on their own offices.

Not so transparent; millions spent in and on their castle keep.

There is an ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS.  The lack of real transparency in the leadership of the APS in a manifestation of that scandal.

The media is complicit in, or complacent over the cover up of that scandal.  Their ongoing failure to investigate and report upon administrative and executive standards and accountability is a manifestation of their complicity and or complacency.




photos Mark Bralley

Ed reforms shallow and in the end, feckless

If the goal is to educate, one has two choices; focus on the individual needs of students or, focus instead upon the needs of (arbitrary) groups of students.  "Arbitrary" in so far as all educational achievement gaps are individual and grouping them in order to apply group solutions serves no ultimately useful purpose.

In order to believe there is a "group achievement gap", the belief must rest on a foundation; that membership in the group affects individual performance.  In order to accept that there is an Hispanic educational gap, one must accept that being Hispanic by itself, affects educational achievement.  It is prejudice.

All achievement gaps are individual.  The most direct and effective solutions will be those that address individual needs individually.

There are those who will argue that we cannot afford enough teachers to give every student the individual attention they need.  Grouping is cheaper, they would argue, than individualizing.

"Cheaper" at what cost?  Grouping students is an expedient, a management tool created to address a problem that didn't exist until the students were grouped for no educationally useful purpose.

In addition to meeting the individual needs of students, teachers are compelled to manage the group dynamic.  Attention must be shared.  In some classrooms, teachers spend so much time and energy on controlling a group of largely recalcitrant children, there is no time to spend in individual attention to individual needs.  Keeping students in "formation" can consume far more time and energy than would addressing their individual needs.

The model in use in public schools is to teach, learn and test in groups.

30 kids with little more in common than the year of their birth, are formed into a thought choirs and expected to learn in unison for the next twelve years.

That model is a manifest failure.  Half of high school graduates are not prepared for college.  Far too many can't even read.

I am aware of no reform of the accepted model, proposed or enacted, that will raise performance more than a few percent; likely less than the margin of error in the measurement.  Even as bold (and inadvisable) step as holding back "non-readers" in the third grade is not going to greatly change the outcome meaningfully.

The only reform that has the potential to really change the game, that could actually result in meaningful improvement, is the abandonment of group learning and the embrace of independent learning.  I suggest that the fundamental goal of public education be reformed, from the effort to standardize individual performance to an effort to recognize and enable individual performance.  The goal of public education should be the creation of independent learners; people who can learn without the need for public "schools".

From a practical standpoint, it is impossible and therefore unrealistic to insist that an entire group of students demonstrate mastery level learning before the rest of the group can move on.  Inevitably faster learners will be held back and slower learners will acquire fewer and fewer basic skills.  And, no one will have had to demonstrate that they have truly mastered anything.

Perhaps the greatest benefit of switching from group to independent learning is that we will finally be able to insist upon mastery level learning.  If learners are required to master basics at every level before moving on, there will be no third graders who can't read.

An insistence upon mastery level learning is critically important and eminently useful.  Students who have mastered basics can acquire advanced skills more easily and effectively.  Students who have not mastered basic skills will not catch up; they will continue to fall further and further behind.

Why does educational reform remain shallow and feckless?

Why don't the people who insist upon cemetery seating and group learning, a dead horse if ever one died, ever have to defend their insistence?

Why don't those who insist that the individual needs of students must continue to be subordinated in deference to the needs of arbitrary groups of students, never have to justify and defend their position?

The short answer is; they
never have to explain, defend
or even acknowledge any of
their positions on anything,
 
... because we can't make them.

Might makes right.




photo Mark Bralley