Board meeting video not posted

Taxpayers have invested a great deal of money in video equipment and salaries in order to make video recordings of board meetings and whatever else they feel like taping.  The district has made a commitment to post the video by the following Friday; yesterday.

A check on APS award winning website, link, reveals that not only has this week's video not been posted, neither has the one from the previous regular board meeting.  Nor from the meeting before that, nor the one before that, nor the one before that.

If you choose to watch the meetings streaming live on their award winning website, you will be greeted with buffering issues that make the viewing useless.

APS has fielded complaints about the buffering issues and so far, has not corrected them.

We will have to wait and wonder about what had Supt Winston Brooks so worked up.

APS postpones progress reports

On the agenda at the APS School Board meeting yesterday, two progress reports.

APS' highly paid Executive Director of Communications Monica Armenta was scheduled to defend her progress in reaching the third of the districts four goals;

Family and Community Involvement; APS will meaningfully engage families and enhance partnerships with the community to maximize student achievement.

Also on the agenda, the highly paid Chief of Police Steve Tellez.

He and APS' highly paid COO Brad Winter were scheduled to defend their progress in reaching the fourth goal;

provide a safe and supportive climate for learning and working that maximizes student achievement.

Tellez would also explain how his publicly funded, private police force needs stand alone certification (in order that they can resume investigating their own felony criminal misconduct).

He would not be there to answer any questions about evidence of felony criminal misconduct by senior APS administrators in the APS Police force, or about why that evidence still has not been surrendered to the District Attorney for prosecution.

Armenta would be there to spin APS' million dollar a year communications effort.

She would not be there to answer any questions about why there will be no place in the entire APS, where the people are allowed to "petition" board members , individually and collectively.  There will be no place where an interest holder can ask legitimate questions about the public interests and their public service, and where they have any intention to respond at all, much less candidly, forthrightly and honestly according to their expectations for students.

The people's right to a forum where questions can be asked, was defended by a representative of the Albuquerque Tea Party.  Judge David Walker (ret) introduced himself as the head of their education "action team".  Walker reiterated the interest in a Citizens Advisory Council on Communications.  The Council would help create a venue for open and honest communication between the leadership of the APS and the community members they serve.

School Board Vice President Kathy Korte was running the public forum.  She is the tip of the spear in the board's resistance to creating any venue where they might have to sit and take questions on their spending of power and resources that belong fundamentally to the people;  the CACoC in particular.

Korte could not bring herself to call Judge Walker by his title.  People who know the judge, call him judge out of respect.  She repeatedly acknowledged him only as "Mr".

As School Board Vice President, Korte is the second highest role model in the entire APS, of the Pillar of Respect.

... more or less.

The presentations were tabled at the request of APS Supt Winston Brooks who was still visibly upset over something that had happened earlier and which had board members publicly apologizing.

Nothing in the Journal.

APS still can't live stream their board meetings without buffering issues.  This despite taxpayers' investment of tens of thousands of dollars worth of state of the art equipment.



We don't know exactly how much it cost, because Winter is yet to produce a candid, forthright and honest accounting of spending at 6400 Uptown Blvd.




photos Mark Bralley

APS student standards of conduct compared to APS Supt Winston Brooks' standards of conduct

They should be the same right?  They aren't.  There are two standards of conduct in the APS,

1. the one that applies to students and 
2. the one that applies to their adult role models; the people who write the standards of conduct that apply to the people who write the standards conduct.

The one, manifestly so very much higher than the other.

If you go to APS' award winning website and search for "student standards of conduct" you will find Student Rules, link.

You will find the Student Behavior Handbook, link.

A quick check on the readability of the SBH demonstrates that the handbook isn't for students. It is written by lawyers for lawyers.

There is no more useless book ever handed to students for them to not read. Nor will they take it home to their parents who, unless they are lawyers, likely can't read it either no matter the language in which it is printed.

We (teachers) used to read it to our students word for word.
It used to be called a rights and responsibilities handbook.
Now only lawyers read it, and only to other lawyers.

You will find the APS Athletic and Activity Code of Conduct, link, and its admonition;

Students who are involved in athletics/activities are held to a(n unspecified) higher standard of conduct ...

and their

Participation in all athletics and activities is a privilege offered to students, and may be withdrawn on the basis of failure to adhere to the high standards of personal conduct and ethical behavior.

Frankly, I was surprised to find the word "ethical".  And then I found the weasel clause;

Professional judgment will be used by coaches, sponsors, and administrators ...

Professional judgement is not subject to review.  It requires neither defense nor explanation. It is what it is; "best" judgement.

When an administrator uses bad judgement, it can easily covered up as their best judgement.  "Easily", because there is no review.

You will not easily find, link, the school board's Code of Ethics, link.

By their own frank admission it is utterly unenforceable.
The title is the last time the word ethics appears.
Like school board policy, it contains no role modeling clause.

It does require them to

Establish an open, two-way communication process with ... the community.

Like I said, their Code of Ethics is utterly unenforceable.

As far as I can tell, aside from the "best judgement" of administrators, the lowest standards of conduct that students are specifically and explicitly required to meet is the law; the lowest standards of conduct acceptable amongst civilized human beings.

The highest standards of conduct mentioned anywhere on APS' award winning website are the Pillars of Character Counts!, link;
a nationally recognized, accepted and respected code of ethical conduct.

According the Student Behavior Handbook, students

are expected to model and promote the Pillars of Character Counts!.

There is only one way to model the Pillars of Character Counts!
and that is to model honest accountability to them.
Character is taught by personal example.
Character is taught only by personal example.

Students are expected to model honest accountability to higher standards of conduct than the law.

The folks who established those standards for students, are not themselves honestly accountable to them.  When they removed the role modeling clause from their own standards of conduct;

In no case shall the standards of conduct for an adult
be lower than the standards of conduct for students.

it was by a unanimous decision to abdicate en masse from their duties and obligations as role models of student standards of conduct.

The leadership of the APS won't tell you the truth about that.

And the establishment media isn't going to tell you the truth about the deliberate decision of the leadership of the APS to, not tell you the truth about executive and administrative standards of conduct and accountability.

The establishment media has decided to not tell you the truth about the ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS.

APS "communications" effort disengenous at best

During the APS school board meeting Wednesday, there will be a public discussion around their goal number 3:

APS will meaningfully engage families and enhance partnerships with the community to maximize student achievement.

Conspicuously absent from the recently reworded goal to improve communication with interest holders, is any mention of the word "communication", in particular, any mention of "two-way" communication.

By "public discussion" it is meant that their discussion will take place in front of the public, not that the public will actually be "meaningfully engaged" in the discussion about how to meaningfully involve them.

School Board enforcer Mary Esquivel

The leadership of the APS, let's say School Board President Marty Esquivel and Supt Winston Brooks to put faces to it, do not want to engage in two-way communication with stakeholders.

It is the last thing they want.

Winston Brooks

They refuse resolutely, to create a venue, or allow anyone else to create a venue, where stakeholders are allowed to ask questions, and where the leadership of the APS is fully expected to respond to those questions.

Not only to "respond", but to respond  
candidly, forthrightly and honestly.

Esquivel and Brooks prefer public forums where questions are not allowed.  They specifically and explicitly prohibit anyone from asking questions during the public forum of regular school board meetings.

Anyone who insists on asking questions anyway, will be ejected by their Praetorian Guard;

their publicly funded, private police force.

Esquivel and Brooks will do everything they can to postpone the day when they will have to stand in front of interest holders and respond to their legitimate questions about;

• the core curriculum,
• test scores,
• truancy,
• the abject lack of respect for nearly 100,000 years of teaching experience in the APS and
• declining staff morale,
• the effects of the lack of student discipline and the number of chronically disruptive students,
• the inadequacy of administrative and executive standards of conduct and competence,
• their lack of honest accountability to those standards,
• the lack due process for whistleblower complaints,
• the abdication of every single solitary senior role model of the student standards of conduct; the Pillars of Character Counts!,
• the public corruption and incompetence in the leadership of their Praetorian Guard; their publicly funded private police force, and,
• whatever the hell else any one of us wants to know about their wielding of our power and their spending of our resources.

The Citizens Advisory Council on Communications stands ready, willing and able to establish open and honest two-way communication between the leadership of the APS and the community members they serve.

The leadership of the APS stands in foursquare in opposition to their efforts.

Nobody knows about the struggle, because the establishment media is in cahoots.

To put a face to it, how about Journal Managing Editor Kent Walz?

Kent Walz is responsible for the Journal's failure to investigate and report upon the Citizens Advisory Council on Communication's efforts to establish standing before the leadership of the APS.

Kent Walz is complicit in an effort to protect the leadership of the APS from legitimate questions about the public interests and about their public service.

There, I said it.  Again.





photos Mark Bralley

APS has put a document together.

They call it Community Input on Goals.
It represents everything they learned during their
community meetings on APS Goals setting.
I do mean everything.

Even for APS, it is not to be believed.
It is 109 pages long, link.

I can't begin to guess how much it cost taxpayers,
nor can I  begin to describe,
of how little use it will be to them.

Imagine an audit of the APS

You will have to "imagine" the audit of executive and administrative standards and accountability in the Albuquerque Public Schools; it will not take place for as long the same group of good ol' boys and girls run the APS and the media.

The audit would cost at most, a few thousand dollars.

APS could even do the audit on itself; as long as the findings were made public.

The auditors would ask;

1. what standards of conduct and competence apply individually and collectively, to the members of the leadership of the APS, and
2. by what means are complaints and allegations of failure to meet those standards decided?

The standards of conduct and competence must be written down somewhere.

They can't just pull a Peercy, link, and say, we hold ourselves accountable to the "highest standards" and then not point them.

Anyone in the APS making more than a quarter of a million dollars a year, should be able to jot them down in a dozen lines, from memory.

If they cannot be pointed to, if you can't look them up somewhere on APS' award winning website; they don't exist.

Accountability is simple; all they have to do is show us the process in the APS where the least powerful can file a complaint against the most powerful, and the complaint is guaranteed due process.

Where in the APS can the most powerful be held accountable by a mechanism where the powerful can exert no undue influence?

Where is the mechanism, powerful enough to hold the most powerful accountable, even against their will?  Where can a complaint be filed, that APS Supt Winston Brooks is hiding evidence of felony criminal misconduct by senior APS administrators, the Caswell Report, and where that complaint will see due process?

APS Supt Winston Brooks could conduct a PowerPoint presentation on "administrative standards and accountability", but he won't.

He won't tell the truth about his own standards and accountability, anymore than he'll conduct a PowerPoint presentations on student discipline, link.




APS School Board President Marty Esquivel could conduct a PowerPoint presentation on "executive standards and accountability", but he won't.

Their presentations, if they were candid, forthright and honest, would reveal incontrovertible evidence of an ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS.

There is only one reason to not tell the truth,
and that is to escape the consequences of so doing.

Imagine the opposite. Imagine that their presentations prove that they have real, written down standards of conduct and competence.  Further imagine that all of those standards are high enough to protect the public interests.

Imagine that their presentations prove that complaints filed against them see due process; the powerless really can hold the powerful accountable for their conduct and competence, even against their will.

Can you imagine the establishment media, the Journal, KRQE, KOAT, and KOB TV, not reporting on their presentations?

By what standards of conduct higher than the law, would positive presentations of standards and accountability be "newsworthy" and the relentless refusal of the leadership of the APS to report candidly, forthrightly and honestly on the lack of standards and accountability, be "not newsworthy"?

The lack of standards and accountability is not one whit harder to investigate and report upon than an investigation and report upon a wealth of standards and accountability.  All they have to do is, ask Brooks and Esquivel to produce the simple truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Why won't they ask?  Why won't they investigate and report upon credible evidence and testimony of an ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS,

... except that they are complicit in its coverup?

If there is another reason, I cannot imagine it, and as yet,
neither they, nor anyone else will articulate it.




photos Mark Bralley

KRQE raked over the coals by blogger

Blogger Joe Monahan, link, suggests that ties between KRQE heavy hitters and principles in the racino scandal, Darren White for one, is affecting KRQE's coverage.

My own history with KRQE corroborates Monahan's impression.

Their close ties with principles, in this case their own lawyer APS School Board President Marty Esquivel, and with former school board heavy hitter Paula Maes, President and CEO of the NM Broadcasters Association, would explain KRQE's relentless refusal to investigate and report upon credible allegations and evidence of a standards and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS.

It is hard to imagine anything more disturbing or ultimately more damaging than the press being in cahoots with the folks they're supposed to be covering.

Another example of course is the Journal, also in cahoots with Esquivel and the leadership of the APS, and who also has made a point of not investigating or reporting upon the ethics and accountability scandal.

KOAT and KOB TV are no better - the ties that bind them to the leadership of the APS and the consequent bias in their coverage are the same.

Where, if they can no longer depend on the local press, will voters get the information they need to vote in school board elections and in bond and mill levy elections over hundreds of millions of dollars?

Shame on them all.




photo Mark Bralley

Journal twixt rock and hard place

Journal editors Kent Walz and Charlie Moore have a problem; their friend APS School Board President Marty Esquivel, the school board and a bunch of the administrative leadership team are about to go down for violating my civil rights.  And for unlawfully hiding public records of public corruption.

The consequent calamity is going to expose what I've been saying all along; there is an ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS;

• they are denying due process to hundreds of whistleblower complaints,
• they are covering up felony criminal misconduct in the leadership of their publicly funded private police force, and
• the entire senior leadership has abdicated as role models of accountability to the Pillars of Character Counts!; the student standards of conduct.

It's all true and they and the Journal are finally going to have to tell their readers the truth about what's been going on, and about how Esquivel et al have cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars.

And then Walz and Moore are going to have to explain to readers; readers who have depended upon them for the truth about the wielding of their power and the spending of their resources, why the Journal has refused to investigate and report upon credible evidence and testimony of all of the above, through school board elections and billions of dollars worth of bond issues and mill levies.

Perhaps Kent Walz will have to explain why he and Marty Esquivel bamboozled the NM FOG into giving APS Supt Winston Brooks a hero of transparency award, while the three of them were complicit in hiding the Caswell Report findings, on the investigation of felony criminal misconduct involving APS senior administrators, from public knowledge.

Perhaps some day, a pint of Häagen-Dazs, wikilink, will serve four.

Marty Esquivel bad lawyer or bad liar?

The Journal covered the story when my complaints were filed in federal court.  I use the term "cover" loosely. Journal editors Kent Walz and Charlie Moore knowingly permitted or negligently allowed reporter Hailey Heinz to pen one sided coverage amounting to journalistic malpractice, link.

In her "investigation and report"; she quoted School Board President Marty Esquivel profusely.

She didn't even bother to contact me, much less quote me.

About him she wrote;

Esquivel, an attorney specializing in First Amendment issues, said he is confident the board has not unfairly limited MacQuigg’s free speech rights. (emphasis added)

Quoting him she wrote;

“I’m very sensitive to how the law should work in terms of people having a right to express themselves, and I have absolutely no reservations about doing what we did as it pertains to Mr. MacQuigg.”

Heinz added;

Esquivel wrote an initial letter to MacQuigg in November 2009, outlining problems with his behavior.

Well it turns out that all the "problems' were videotaped. APS has produced those videotapes, link, link, as evidence against me.

We of course, point to those tapes as constitutionally protected behavior; could not have said it better ourselves.

Heinz argued on Esquivel's behalf;

Board member Martin Esquivel said he imposed the ban on MacQuigg two years ago when he was school board president because of MacQuigg’s conduct, not the content of his speech.

The obvious problem, obvious to anyone who actually watches the record, is not my conduct.  My conduct is well within the limits of the constitutionally protected human to petition one's government.

Also obvious to anyone who actually watches the record, Esquivel's professed confidence that (he) has not acted unfairly is patently unwarranted.

And as obvious to anyone who actually watches the record, Esquivel's "sensitivity" to how the law should work in terms of people having a right to express themselves, is woefully inadequate.  The first amendment specialist is practicing beyond his expertise.

Any lawyer with any sense would have "reservations" in the face of over whelming evidence of his blatant violations of my civil rights.

But not Marty Esquivel.

The problem, obvious to anyone who actually watches the record, is the content of my speech; a relentless effort to hold them honestly accountable for their conduct and competence.  The problem is my standing up at public forums and calling public attention to issues to which they would rather attention not be paid;

• the coverup of corruption in the leadership of their police force,
• the denial of due process to hundreds of whistleblowers,
• the ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS, and
• their abdication as role models of the student standards of conduct.

The problem is my relentless insistence that they respond candidly, forthrightly and honestly to legitimate questions about the public interests and about their public service.

Who are you going to believe, Marty Esquivel or your lyin eyes?




photo Mark Bralley

Esquivel's video

School Board President Defendant Marty Esquivel shot some video during the incident at the Aug 25, 2010 Audit Committee Meeting.

Mark Bralley and I were accused of recording an in secret meeting, in violation of the Open Meetings Act; an allegation we flatly deny.

There was no due process,  nor evidence that we had done anything wrong, nor, frankly, even any evidence that anything wrong had been been done, videolink.

The video was shot by School Board President Marty Esquivel.  He's grasping at straws; desperately that trying to prove there is a reason to deny me the free exercise of constitutionally protected human rights, other than the fact that he finds my truth telling  personally threatening; embarrassing, shaming, and maybe someday, worthy of criminal investigation by a police force other than his own.

The video ends when he turns to confront me for taking a photograph of him videotaping us.

 

Note please, the entirely appropriate distance that separates us; contrary to their several unfounded allegations to the contrary.  Note as well, the Character Counts! quilt, in front of which this all takes place.




photo Mark Bralley

Should APS students learn about character?

Should there be in the APS, a conscientious effort to teach students about character in the hope they will grow into adults holding themselves accountable to "higher" standards of conduct?

Where will that question be discussed; openly, honestly and with meaningful public participation?

Sadly, the answer is nowhere.  There is no place where the senior-most role models of student standards of conduct will sit and discuss their efforts to develop character in students.  Their total investment in character education can be found in the Student Behavior Handbook; "... students are expected to model and promote the Pillars of Character Counts!"

Ask a student you know, to name all six.

Supt Winston Brooks

There are senior administrators and board members who cannot name all six.

APS' senior-most administrative role model of accountability to the Pillars of Character Counts! Winston Brooks used to have a CC! quilt hanging on the wall outside his office.

It and the attention it drew to Character Counts! are long gone.


 Board Member David Robbins, seen as he was ordering the APS police to eject us, sits below another Character Counts! quilt; less fancy than Brooks' and apparently handmade, perhaps by students, long ago when character still counted in the APS.

Why doesn't the leadership of the APS want to talk openly and honestly about character education in the APS?

I can think of at least one reason; they want to avoid any discussion during which it will be revealed that the entire leadership of the APS has abdicated from their responsibilities as role models of any higher standard of conduct than the law; the lowest standard of conduct, and the highest standard to which they can be held "legally" accountable.

They struck the role modeling clause from their own standards of conduct in an effort to eliminate accountability to higher standards of conduct than the law.  When their own code of conduct read;

In no case shall the standards of conduct for an adult be lower than the standards of conduct for students.

they were, by logical extension, accountable as role models of student standards of conduct; standards that require from them;

more than the law requires and, less than the law allows.

The Journal, Kent Walz and Charlie Moore, has agreed, at least tacitly, to help them cover up the ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS.   As have those whose fists pound the table last at KRQE, KOAT, and KOB TV.

I submit as proof, the self evident scandal and the abject lack of investigation and report by the establishment media.

Do you really believe that if their cronies in the establishment media could report actual, honest accountability to higher standards of conduct than the law, they wouldn't be splashing it all over their front page and our television screens?




Brooks photo Mark Bralley
Robbins ched macquigg

Marty Esquivel role model. Not.

The very instant that APS School Board President Marty Esquivel became the school board president, he donned mantelet of senior most role model of student standards of conduct.

You wouldn't know it.  He thinks his silent abdication trumps his moral obligations.

He is yet to explain the math to interest holders.

One doesn't decide whether they are a role model.  Coaches don't get to decide whether they are role models.  The only deciding they get to do is, whether to be role models of accountability to the highest standards of conduct or something lower.

Teachers don't get to decide whether they are role models for students.

And school board presidents don't get to decide whether they are role models for thousands of employees and tens of thousands of students.

Esquivel's abdication, his denial, whether he doesn't want and won't accept the duties and responsibilities of his position as a role model is immaterial.  He is the senior most role model of the student standards of conduct.

The student standards of conduct are a nationally recognized, accepted and respected code of ethical conduct. The Student Behavior Handbook specifically and explicitly expects students to “model and promote the Pillars of Character Counts!” link.

Fundamental to the concept of ethical standards of conduct, is honest accountability to them.  You really can't have the one without the other.  There is not a whit of difference between the highest standards of conduct and the lowest, if there is not actual honest accountability.

One cannot claim to be “(role) modeling the Pillars of  Character Counts!” except by holding oneself honestly accountable to them.  Accountability is central to role modeling. It is the accountability which needs the very most, to be role modeled.

It is the foundation of role modeling.

Otherwise, all we have is a centuries old fable about a kid a hatchet and a cherry tree, to point to when we need an example of honest accountability to higher standards of conduct than the law.

There is a need for role models to conspicuously manifest willingness to do more than the law requires, and less than the law allows. 

Mr. Esquivel has made it pretty clear that he has no intention to step up as a role model of accountability to the Pillars of Character Counts1, the same standards of conduct he enforces upon nearly 90,000 of this community’s sons and daughters.

He has made it pretty clear that he has no intention to allow me to stand up at a public forum and ask him ever again, if he will point to the time, the day, and the place,

1. where he will stand up as a role model of accountability to the Pillars of Character Counts!, or
2. where he will stand up in front of students and explain to them, in words they can understand, why, they are expected to hold themselves honestly accountable to higher standards of conduct than the law, and he is not.

The establishment media is well aware of dual standards of conduct in the APS; the egregious hypocrisy of ethical standards of conduct for students and the lowest standards of conduct for senior administrators and board members.

They choose to not investigate and report upon it.





photo Mark Bralley

The evidence against me; you be the judge

This isn't everything that APS School Board President Marty Esquivel and the rest of the defendants have produced as evidence in their defense against my complaints that they have violated my civil rights.  It isn't even the most damning to their defense.

I've have edited their production to eliminate their repeated recitations of the rules they wrote to prevent me from challenging their character and competence as politicians and public servants from the podium during public forum.

If you Google "worst behavior protected by the First Amendment", about 0.53 seconds later 33,100,000 results will appear.  Admittedly, I have not read them all.  In fact I didn't read one.  Never the less I would be willing to bet the conduct was more outrageous than mine.

Here it is then warts and all; unashamedly and absolutely without apology;

• APS' video production, June 4, 2008 thru Sept 17, 2008 link
• APS' video production Sept 17 con't thru December 2nd 2008, link
• APS' video production Jan 21, 2009 Aug 19, 2009 link
• APS' video production Aug 19 con't thru November 4, 2009 link

It was after the Nov 4th meeting, when APS Supt Winston Brooks advised school board member Robert Lucero to use a pistol to "take me out", link.

Last day of school a waste of money

The last day of school in the APS costs taxpayers the same as every other day of school; nearly five million dollars.  We pay for 182 of them every year.

Students don't get 182 days of learning.  The truth is they get nowhere close.

Take away all the days when students are doing something beside learning; days spent in testing for example, and I wouldn't be surprised to find students probably spend one day in two "learning".  Senior year in the APS ends two weeks early.

In the past, APS' Executive Director of Communications Monica Armenta has claimed some pretty outrageous numbers for last day attendance; 2012, link.  That was the year she offered; if the last day of school was meaningless, it was the teacher's fault.  And in 2011, link.

One wonders what she will claim this year.

One wonders if the establishment media will even ask.




photo Mark Bralley

APS spending $60K on their defense

APS is yet to comply with an IPRA request to inspect and/or copy the actual signed contract providing for a legal defense for APS School Board President Marty Esquivel, former School Board Member David Robbins,  APS Chief of Police Steve Tellez, APS Executive Director of Communications Monica Armenta, APS Director of Communications Rigo Chavez, and APS Supt Winston Brooks.  But upon information and belief, when the actual contracts are finally produced, they will limit the lawyers fees, regardless of their hourly rate, to $30K.

I haven't seen the contracts, and until we do we don't know what else will be paid for out of "operational funds"; funds that if they were being spent on legal defenses would be spend instead, in classrooms.

We do know for sure, because Rigo Chavez has admitted it, the contracts do not include language requiring a "case analysis" presentation to the entire board.  Right now, the only board members who know the truth are the ones being sued and hiring the lawyers.  They have a manifest conflict of interests.

The presentation of the case analysis, if it ever takes place, will take place in secret and no recording will be made.  If they decide illegally to do something or another, there will be no record to subpoena.

The oversight of the entire board is an important check and balance and should not have been left out of these contracts.  It represents executive oversight (the people through elected board members) over the administration of immense public power and resources.

The only oversight over these contracts will come from the APS Director of Risk Management and an APS "procurement representative"; both of whom are subordinates of Brooks and everyone around and above him.

When the dust settles on this case, and it will settle soon because there is a preliminary injunction in the works,
it will be obvious the best interests of students would have been better served, had they obeyed their own code of ethics, the first rule of which reads;

Make the education and well-being of students the basis for all decision making.

Students would have been better served had Marty Esquivel and the rest of the Defendants simply stipulated their guilt, admitted they had made mistakes and then paid the consequences.  Not only would taxpayers have saved a lot of money, but students would have had a few honest to God role models of people stepping up to face the consequences of their indiscretions.

These people spend a lot of time and energy keeping a story alive about a kid chopping down a cherry tree and then stepping up to the consequences.  We tell kids that story because there are so few contemporary examples to point to instead.

We resort to fiction because there are so few adults who are willing to be role models of honest accountability to higher standards of conduct than the law; to do more than the law requires and less than the law allows.

Marty Esquivel, Brooks and the rest are doing everything the law allows in their effort to escape earned consequences.  They will do nothing responsible, unless the law requires it, absolutely, unequivocally and only after they have exhausted every possible legal weaselry, loophole and technicality

They will do so in their own self-interests and in those of other board members and senior administrators.








APS Supt Winston Brooks  and APS School Board President Marty Esquivel are the senior-most administrative and executive role models of student standards of conduct, and are unwilling to hold themselves honestly accountable the standards they established and expect students to "model and promote"; the Pillars of Character Counts!.

Every generation expects the next generation to be the first generation to hold themselves honestly accountable to higher standards of conduct than the law.

Every generation expects the next generation to hold themselves accountable to higher standards of conduct than they will hold themselves.

The question here isn't "how much" Marty Esquivel and the rest of the Defendants are spending, it is "why" they are spending that much in an effort to escape the consequences of their own misconduct?

The "talk" students hear is, step up to accountability.
The "walk" they watch is, do as I say, not as I do.

Students are expected to model and promote accountability to higher standards of conduct than the adults, who are arguably unaccountable even to the law; the lowest standards of conduct.

How are they spending in their own interests and without public oversight?

Because the establishment media is in cahoots, that's why.




photos Mark Bralley

The problem with wearing an elephant mask

is not that it means you are a threat or a safety risk, but that someone like Marty Esquivel will try to make it look like it does.

APS School Board President Marty Esquivel is defending himself in federal court against righteous complaints over his disregard of my constitutionally protected human rights to speak freely, to assemble freely, to petition my government for redress of my several grievances, and for due process from the government in its effort to obstruct my efforts.

Esquivel and the other defendants want very badly for someone to believe that he and they have banned me from board meetings, effectively for the rest of my life, because I constitute a realistic threat to his and their personal safety.

There is no real evidence to support their claim.

There are no witness who are not hopelessly conflicted.

Citing as evidence of the threat I present; the wearing of an elephant mask to two school board meetings.

I stood quietly against a back wall.  I made no outward effort to be disruptive; quite the contrary.

On separate occasions APS Director of Communications Rigo Chavez and APS Executive Director of Communications Monica Armenta came to chat with me.  Neither offered any indication that they were at all afraid.

One of them, I can't recall which, came up to me to explain that they had figured out that I was "the elephant in the room."

I wore the elephant mask to those board meetings in an effort to draw attention to the elephant in the room at board meetings; the obvious truth being ignored;

• the abdication of the senior-most role models of the student standards of conduct; 
• the ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS; 
• the relentless pretense of high standards and accountability in the face of overwhelming evidence of their absence.
• In particular the absence of accountability for the senior leadership and role models, to any standards of conduct higher than the law; the lowest standards of conduct.
• a manifest record of lack of accountability even to the law.  Witness the cover up felony criminal misconduct in the leadership of their Praetorian Guard, their publicly funded, private police force.

Marty Esquivel told me in a later meeting, link, he had thought it was a mouse mask.

Whatever else it did, it proved Esquivel and the board weren't going to talk about standards, accountability and role modeling no matter what.

And it proved the Journal was not going to investigate and report upon the ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS, no matter what.

So at least, it wasn't a total waste.




photo Mark Bralley

APS and TIG; KRQE, KOAT, KOB and the Journal know

The following email was sent to the appropriate news tip destination at the Journal, KRQE, KOAT, and KOB TV.

Recently, Technology Integration Group was raided by the FBI.

APS and TIG have been business partners for a long time with very lucrative contracts.

TIG has been investigated in other communities.

At one time, APS was audited by Meyners & Co.
You can get a copy of their findings from Rigo Chavez, APS’ custodian of public records. The findings are immediately available; he should produce them rather immediately.

In them, you will find, the auditors found a lack of standards, accountability, and record keeping – a perfect opportunity for corruption.

You will find APS’ records on their interactions with TIG wanting. In fact, you’ll probably remain wanting to see them; I believe they’ve been lost, destroyed, or maybe never created.

One of Meyners’ findings was that APS senior administrators were spending up to $50K at a whack “without involving purchasing”. A lot of that money went to TIG.

It would be interesting to know if APS is involved in the FBI investigation.

It would be interesting to know what records the Meyners auditors found missing.

Newsworthy?  I guess we'll see.

When TIG was throwing parties for APS, KRQE found it newsworthy, link.

One could argue it's newsworthy, regardless of whether APS is getting phone calls and emails from FBI auditors, or not.  Wouldn't good news about APS bookkeeping and procurement be newsworthy?

What if APS' Executive Director of Communication Monica Armenta could actually stand up some where, some time, and assure taxpayers that APS was not likely the victim of some scam, nor is APS about to be accused of being up to their eyeballs in some scam involving one of their longer standing and largest vendors?

How could that not be newsworthy?



photo Mark Bralley

APS TIG records missing

TIG, Technology Integration Group, subjects of an investigation by the FBI, link, were doing business with the APS at a time when auditors from Meyners & Co had found that APS' Finance Department had;

1. inadequate standards, 
2. inadequate accountability and 
3. inadequate record keeping;

the trifecta of circumstances for public corruption and misappropriation of public money.

Nobody ever went to jail for not keeping records accurate and complete enough, to send them to jail.

If the FBI looks for the records of public money flowing to TIG through the leadership of the APS, they won't find many.

These are the same records; a candid, forthright and honest accounting of spending at 6400 Uptown Blvd, that APS COO Brad Winter has already chosen to not produce, link.

These are the same records the Meyners auditors found missing.

APS vendor raided by the FBI

Technology Integration Group was raided by the FBI today, link.

The TIG has had a long and lucrative relationship with the leadership of the Albuquerque Public Schools.  The relationship dates back to a time when APS senior administrators were spending $50K at a whack "without involving Purchasing" in a Finance Department where auditors found; inadequate standards, inadequate accountability to such standards as there are, and inadequate record keeping - the trifecta of public corruption.  Larry Barker was on their trail for awhile, link.  Mark Bralley dug deeper, link.  Likely, millions and millions of dollars went missing.

Most recently, TIG sold APS and taxpayers a whole bunch of whiteboards, millions of dollars worth, now gathering dust all over the district.

Stay tuned.

Esquivel's outrage disingenuous at best

KRQE offers a follow up piece the story about a high school wrestler getting away with murder and politician who helped him do it; County Commissioner Art De La Cruz, link.

KRQE, because of personal and professional ties with APS School Board President Marty Esquivel, they allow him regular opportunities to keep his face in front of voters, who he hopes will one day propel him into the Attorney General's Office.  Their story features Esquivel and his outrage over the Commissioner's conduct unbecoming.

Marty Esquivel is the senior-most of the most senior role models of student standards of conduct in the entire Albuquerque Public Schools.  He expects students to "model and promote the Pillars of Character Counts!; a nationally recognized, accepted and respected code of ethical conduct.

He is a role model whether he likes it or not; whether he accepts it or not.

Yet he, and the rest of the most senior role models of student standards of conduct have utterly abandoned their responsibilities as role models, link.

Would be voters will be mightily impressed with Esquivel's righteous outrage over De La Cruz' outrageous failure as a public servant.

Would be voters won't hear about Esquivel's outrageous failure as a role model of the standards of conduct he establishes and has enforced upon students, because like I said,
Esquivel has personal and professional ties with KRQE.

... and the Journal, and KOAT, and KOB.




photo Mark Bralley