tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32800006.post8420276299565820167..comments2023-05-15T02:14:27.684-06:00Comments on Diogenes' six: APS settles another Brooks lawsuit in secretched macquigghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06433039009492338854noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32800006.post-19087222776841877422014-10-09T06:37:00.868-06:002014-10-09T06:37:00.868-06:00I think Esquivel doesn't want to end up on the...I think Esquivel doesn't want to end up on the wrong end of another law suit, despite how much he and the rest of the board would like to keep everything secret.ched macquigghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06433039009492338854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32800006.post-65646674428111640472014-10-08T17:43:29.470-06:002014-10-08T17:43:29.470-06:00Marty Esquivel, the self-proclaimed expert on cons...Marty Esquivel, the self-proclaimed expert on constitutional law, seems irked that the latest APS settlement remains confidential, and he blames the board for it. Does that mean that he did not agree with the settlement in the first place since it is the majority of the board that decides if any lawsuit against APS gets settled or goes to court? If he supposedly advocates for transparency, why does he not make public the special report made on Brooks that forced Brooks to resign? Why does the language of Brooks' settlement include Brooks' wife? Since when was she an APS employee? So, Esquivel is silent on Brooks, but he is vocal on Brooks' victim? Lots of unanswered questions that actually do not need answers, for any reasonable person can see through Esquivel's hypocritical cries for transparency.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com